Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;124(12):1829-1839.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14702. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia

Jmn Duffy et al. BJOG. 2017 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Standardising outcome collection and reporting in pre-eclampsia trials requires an appraisal of current outcome reporting.

Objectives: To map maternal and offspring outcome reporting across randomised trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia.

Search strategy: Randomised trials were identified by searching bibliographical databases from inception to January 2016.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials.

Data collection and analysis: We systematically extracted and categorised outcome reporting.

Main results: Seventy-nine randomised trials, reporting data from 31 615 maternal participants and 28 172 of their offspring, were included. Fifty-five different interventions were evaluated. Included trials reported 119 different outcomes, including 72 maternal outcomes and 47 offspring outcomes. Maternal outcomes were inconsistently reported across included trials; for example, 11 trials (14%) reported maternal mortality, reporting data from 12 422 participants, and 16 trials (20%) reported cardiovascular morbidity, reporting data from 14 963 maternal participants. Forty-three trials (54%) reported fetal outcomes and 23 trials (29%) reported neonatal outcomes. Twenty-eight trials (35%) reported offspring mortality. There was poor reporting of childhood outcomes: six trials (8%) reported neurodevelopmental outcomes. Less than half of included trials reported any relevant information regarding harms for maternal participants and their offspring.

Conclusions: Most randomised trials evaluating interventions for pre-eclampsia are missing information on clinically important outcomes, and in particular have neglected to evaluate efficacy and safety in the offspring of participants. Developing and implementing a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, in future pre-eclampsia trials could help to address these issues.

Tweetable abstract: Future #preeclampsia research requires a core outcome set to reduce #research waste. @coreoutcomes @jamesmnduffy International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42015015529; www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.aspID=CRD42015015529.

Keywords: Core outcome set; outcome reporting bias; pre-eclampsia; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types