In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid
- PMID: 28432878
- PMCID: PMC9425527
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.010
In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid
Abstract
Introduction: Treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus remains as a clinical challenge due to emergence of new resistance mechanisms. Tedizolid is a next-generation oxazolidinone, recently approved for skin and soft tissues infections. We conducted a study to determine in vitro susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid in MRSA clinical isolates from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections.
Material and methods: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were collected in three tertiary-care hospitals of Medellin, Colombia, from February 2008 to June 2010 as part of a previous study. Clinical characteristics were assessed by medical records and MIC values were determined by Epsilometer test. Genotypic analysis included spa typing, MLST, and SCCmec typing.
Results: A total of 150 MRSA isolates were evaluated and tedizolid MIC values obtained showed higher in vitro activity than other antimicrobials, with MIC values ranging from 0.13μg/mL to 0.75μg/mL and lower values of MIC50 and MIC90 (0.38μg/mL and 0.5μg/mL). In contrast, vancomycin and linezolid had higher MIC values, which ranged from 0.5μg/mL to 2.0μg/mL and from 0.38μg/mL to 4.0μg/mL, respectively. Tedizolid MICs were 2- to 5-fold lower than those of linezolid. Clinical characteristics showed high previous antimicrobial use and hospitalization history. The majority of the strains belong to the CC8 harboring the SCCmec IVc and were associated with the spa t1610 (29.33%, n=44).
Conclusion: In vitro effectiveness of tedizolid was superior for isolates from skin and soft tissue infections in comparison with the other antibiotics evaluated. The above added to its less toxicity, good bioavailability, daily dose and unnecessity of dosage adjustment, make tedizolid in a promising alternative for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA.
Keywords: Daptomycin; Linezolid; MRSA; Skin and soft tissues infections; Tedizolid; Vancomycin.
Copyright © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
In vitro activity of tedizolid and other comparator drugs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in skin and soft tissue infections in seven Colombian hospitals.Biomedica. 2018 Dec 1;38(4):507-513. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v38i4.4022. Biomedica. 2018. PMID: 30653864 English, Spanish.
-
Evaluation of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jan;71(1):152-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv302. Epub 2015 Oct 16. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016. PMID: 26476277
-
In Vitro activities of Tedizolid and comparator antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus collected in 12 countries from 2014 to 2016.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;89(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28793964
-
Tedizolid: a novel oxazolidinone with potent activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.Drugs. 2015 Feb;75(3):253-70. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0352-7. Drugs. 2015. PMID: 25673021 Review.
-
Potential role of tedizolid phosphate in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Apr 3;7:243-65. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S30728. Print 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013. PMID: 23589680 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.Core Evid. 2019 Jul 5;14:31-40. doi: 10.2147/CE.S187499. eCollection 2019. Core Evid. 2019. PMID: 31308835 Free PMC article.
-
Interplay between ESKAPE Pathogens and Immunity in Skin Infections: An Overview of the Major Determinants of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance.Pathogens. 2021 Feb 2;10(2):148. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020148. Pathogens. 2021. PMID: 33540588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022 Aug 17;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022. PMID: 35978400 Free PMC article.
-
Tedizolid Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Sep 4;8(3):137. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030137. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31487837 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution of the Most Prevalent Spa Types among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus around the World: A Review.Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 12;9:163. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00163. eCollection 2018. Front Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29487578 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aires de Sousa M., de Lencastre H. Bridges from hospitals to the laboratory: genetic portraits of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004;40:101–111. - PubMed
-
- Ruef C. Epidemiology and clinical impact of glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Infection. 2004;32:315–327. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical