Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;46(7):743-755.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0919-5. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective

Affiliations
Review

Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective

Tähti Pohjanmies et al. Ambio. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Forests are widely recognized as major providers of ecosystem services, including timber, other forest products, recreation, regulation of water, soil and air quality, and climate change mitigation. Extensive tracts of boreal forests are actively managed for timber production, but actions aimed at increasing timber yields also affect other forest functions and services. Here, we present an overview of the environmental impacts of forest management from the perspective of ecosystem services. We show how prevailing forestry practices may have substantial but diverse effects on the various ecosystem services provided by boreal forests. Several aspects of these processes remain poorly known and warrant a greater role in future studies, including the role of community structure. Conflicts among different interests related to boreal forests are most likely to occur, but the concept of ecosystem services may provide a useful framework for identifying and resolving these conflicts.

Keywords: Conflict; Forest management; Sustainability; Timber production; Trade-off.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Framework linking forest management activities via forest structures and functions to final benefits and values experienced by humans. Indicators of ecosystem service supply may be defined based on all of the four stages of ecosystem service generation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Numbers of results returned by the literature searches using search strings related to boreal forestry and different phenomena associated with specific ecosystem services. Each ecosystem service had its own predefined set of search terms. The dark grey part of each bar shows the portion of the search results returned when the additional search term “ecosystem service*” was used. A detailed description of the literature searches, including a full list of search terms, is given in Online Appendix S1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of some of the main connections between forest management activities, forest characteristics, and ecosystem services. Lines connecting the boxes in the columns show the impacts of management via forest characteristics on ecosystem services. These connections also show how identification and assessment of ecosystem services may guide management choices

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, et al. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics. 2014;103:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012. - DOI
    1. Asselin H, Larouche M, Kneeshaw D. Assessing forest management scenarios on an Aboriginal territory through simulation modeling. Forestry Chronicle. 2015;91:426–435. doi: 10.5558/tfc2015-072. - DOI
    1. Atlegrim O, Sjöberg K. Response of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) to clear-cutting and single-tree selection harvests in uneven-aged boreal Picea abies forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 1996;86:39–50. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03794-2. - DOI
    1. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters. 2009;12:1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, et al. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2012;37:421–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836. - DOI

Grants and funding