Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows
- PMID: 28434750
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12246
Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were detected between farms, suggesting that the use of automated activity monitors is prone to individual farm management.
Keywords: automated activity monitor; dairy cow; health; timed artificial insemination.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Extending the duration of the voluntary waiting period from 60 to 88 days in cows that received timed artificial insemination after the Double-Ovsynch protocol affected the reproductive performance, herd exit dynamics, and lactation performance of dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jan;101(1):717-735. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13046. Epub 2017 Oct 18. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID: 29055542
-
Reproductive performance of dairy cows managed with a program aimed at increasing insemination of cows in estrus based on increased physical activity and fertility of timed artificial inseminations.J Dairy Sci. 2015 Apr;98(4):2488-501. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8961. Epub 2015 Feb 7. J Dairy Sci. 2015. PMID: 25660744
-
Reproductive performance and herd exit dynamics of lactating dairy cows managed for first service with the Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch protocol and different duration of the voluntary waiting period.J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1673-1686. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13425. Epub 2017 Dec 14. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID: 29248225
-
Evaluation of prostaglandin F2α versus prostaglandin F2α plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone as Presynch methods preceding an Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis.J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):4065-4077. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11956. Epub 2017 Mar 17. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID: 28318589
-
Expression and detection of estrus in dairy cows: the role of new technologies.Animal. 2014 May;8 Suppl 1:134-43. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000299. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Animal. 2014. PMID: 24680286 Review.
Cited by
-
Rumen-Reticular Temperature During Estrus and Ovulation Using Automated Activity Monitors in Dairy Cows.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Dec 16;7:597512. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.597512. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33392289 Free PMC article.
-
Peri-estrus activity and mounting behavior and its application to estrus detection in Hanwoo (Korea Native Cattle).J Anim Sci Technol. 2023 Jul;65(4):748-758. doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e126. Epub 2023 Jul 30. J Anim Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37970510 Free PMC article.
-
Performance and Cost-Efficiency of Single Hormonal Treatment Protocols in Tropical Anestrous Dairy Cows.Animals (Basel). 2024 May 25;14(11):1564. doi: 10.3390/ani14111564. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38891611 Free PMC article.
-
Wearable Collar Technologies for Dairy Cows: A Systematized Review of the Current Applications and Future Innovations in Precision Livestock Farming.Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):458. doi: 10.3390/ani15030458. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39943229 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interval from Oestrus to Ovulation in Dairy Cows-A Key Factor for Insemination Time: A Review.Vet Sci. 2024 Mar 29;11(4):152. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11040152. Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38668419 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources