Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;98(10):1977-1983.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications

Affiliations

Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications

Veronica T Rowe et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the measurement properties of the Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity (FTHUE) and examine how its score may or may not inform design of a rehabilitation program.

Design: The FTHUE was recently used in the Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation randomized controlled trial. This circumstance provided the opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the FTHUE as it pertains to contemporary poststroke rehabilitation and recovery models.

Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic.

Participants: Participants (N=109; mean age, 61.2±13.5y; mean days poststroke, 46±20.3) with resultant hemiparesis in the upper extremity.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Dimensionality was examined with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and person and item measures were derived with Rasch item response analysis. Therapists' notes were also reviewed.

Results: The CFA results support unidimensionality, and 16 of 17 items fit the Rasch model. The Rasch person separation (2.17) and item separation (4.50) indices, ability strata (3.22), person reliability (.82), and item reliability (.95) indicate good measurement properties. Item difficulties ranked from -6.46 to 3.43 logits; however, there was a substantial ceiling effect of person measures. Post hoc examination of therapists' written observations indicated that the scoring criteria are not sensitive to the movement strategy used for task completion.

Conclusions: The FTHUE's item difficulty hierarchy indicated that scores adequately distinguished the ability to perform simple versus complex motor movements of functional tasks. However, the FTHUE scoring method did not allow inclusion of the type of movement strategy used to accomplish task items. Therefore, we suggest modifications to the FTHUE that would allow it to be used for collaborative treatment planning and align well with more contemporary perspectives on treatment theory.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00871715.

Keywords: Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper Extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated AND, if applicable, we certify that all financial and material support for this research (eg, NIH or NHS grants) and work are clearly identified in the title page of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rasch Analysis Wright Person-Item Map
The center vertical column is the measurement metric in logit units ranging from −6.00 to 5.00. Relative to this column, people are to the left and items are to the right. People are located along the metric according to their measures of person ability so that lower ability people (low person measures) are at the bottom of the map, and higher ability people (high person measures) are at the top of the map. Each item is located along the metric according to its measure of item difficulty. The easiest items are located at the bottom of the map and the more difficult items are located at the top of the map.

References

    1. Wilson DJ, Baker LL, Craddock JA. Functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity. AJOT. 1984;38(3):159–164. - PubMed
    1. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):620–628. - PubMed
    1. Sugg K, Müller S, Winstein C, Hathorn D, Dempsey A. Does action observation training with immediate physical practice improve hemiparetic upper-limb function in chronic stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(9):807–17. - PubMed
    1. Fischer HC, Stubblefield K, Kline T, Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG. Hand rehabilitation following stroke: A pilot study of assisted finger extension training in a virtual environment. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2007;14(1):1–12. - PubMed
    1. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper Rowe; 1970.

Publication types

Associated data