Pharmacokinetics and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in healthy subjects with asymptomatic eyes: data from 2 independent clinical studies
- PMID: 28435218
- PMCID: PMC5391828
- DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S126690
Pharmacokinetics and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in healthy subjects with asymptomatic eyes: data from 2 independent clinical studies
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.77% olopatadine from 2 independent (Phase I and Phase III, respectively) clinical studies in healthy subjects.
Materials and methods: The Phase I, multicenter, randomized (2:1), vehicle-controlled study was conducted in subjects ≥18 years old (N=36) to assess the systemic pharmacokinetics of olopatadine 0.77% following single- and multiple-dose exposures. The Phase III, multicenter, randomized (2:1), vehicle-controlled study was conducted in subjects ≥2 years old (N=499) to evaluate long-term ocular safety of olopatadine 0.77%. Subjects received olopatadine 0.77% or vehicle once daily bilaterally for 7 days in the pharmacokinetic study and 6 weeks in the safety study.
Results: In the pharmacokinetic study, olopatadine 0.77% was absorbed slowly and reached a peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 1.65 ng/mL following single-dose and 1.45 ng/mL following multiple-dose exposures in 2 hours (time to reach maximum plasma concentration [Tmax]). After reaching peak concentrations, olopatadine showed a similar mono-exponential decay following single and multiple doses with mean elimination half-life ranging from 2.90 to 3.40 hours. No accumulation in olopatadine exposure (Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours) was evident after multiple doses when compared to single dose. In the safety study, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 26.7% and 31.4% of subjects with olopatadine 0.77% and vehicle, respectively. Blurred vision was the most frequent ocular treatment-emergent adverse event in both treatment groups (olopatadine 0.77% vs vehicle, 4.8% vs 4.1%). No deaths or serious adverse events were reported during the study.
Conclusion: Olopatadine 0.77% had minimal systemic exposure or accumulation in healthy subjects and was well tolerated in both adult and pediatric subjects.
Keywords: allergic conjunctivitis; ocular allergy; olopatadine; pharmacokinetics; safety.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Dr Abhijit Narvekar is an employee in Alcon Research Ltd (Fort Worth, TX, USA). The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Pharmacokinetics of orally administered single- and multiple-dose olopatadine in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label study.Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(7):451-457. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929070-00003. Clin Drug Investig. 2009. PMID: 19499962
-
Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model.Cornea. 2015 Oct;34(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000562. Cornea. 2015. PMID: 26266427 Clinical Trial.
-
Ocular pharmacokinetics comparison between 0.2% olopatadine and 0.77% olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solutions administered to male New Zealand white rabbits.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015 May;31(4):204-10. doi: 10.1089/jop.2014.0140. Epub 2015 Mar 16. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015. PMID: 25775192
-
Efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using a conjunctival allergen-challenge model.Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 14;9:1703-13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S83263. eCollection 2015. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 26392751 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1272-80. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80106-5. Clin Ther. 2001. PMID: 11558863 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Safety and Tolerability of Bilastine 0.6% Ophthalmic Solution: An 8-Weeks Phase III Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 4;17:735-746. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S398168. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36909350 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacodynamic model of slow reversible binding and its applications in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling: review and tutorial.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2022 Oct;49(5):493-510. doi: 10.1007/s10928-022-09822-y. Epub 2022 Aug 30. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2022. PMID: 36040645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical ketotifen treatment for allergic conjunctivitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 18;16(2):286-292. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.02.17. eCollection 2023. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36816214 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tsunoo M, Momomura S, Masuo M, Iizuka H. Phase 1 clinical study on KW-4679, an antiallergic drug: safety and pharmacokinetics in the single and repeated administration study in healthy subjects. Kiso To Rinsho. 1995;29:18.
-
- Gomes PJ. Trends in prevalence and treatment of ocular allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;14(5):451–456. - PubMed
-
- Calonge M. Classification of ocular atopic/allergic disorders and conditions: an unsolved problem. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1999;(228):10–13. - PubMed
-
- Bonini S. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy. 2004;59(suppl 78):71–73. - PubMed
-
- Friedlaender MH. Ocular allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;11(5):477–482. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources