First, do no harm: institutional betrayal and trust in health care organizations
- PMID: 28435281
- PMCID: PMC5388348
- DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S125885
First, do no harm: institutional betrayal and trust in health care organizations
Abstract
Purpose: Patients' trust in health care is increasingly recognized as important to quality care, yet questions remain about what types of health care experiences erode trust. The current study assessed the prevalence and impact of institutional betrayal on patients' trust and engagement in health care.
Participants and methods: Participants who had sought health care in the US in October 2013 were recruited from an online marketplace, Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Participants (n = 707; 73% Caucasian; 56.8% female; 9.8% lesbian, gay, or bisexual; median age between 18 and 35 years) responded to survey questions about health care use, trust in health care providers and organizations, negative medical experiences, and institutional betrayal.
Results: Institutional betrayal was reported by two-thirds of the participants and predicted disengagement from health care (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). Mediational models (tested using bootstrapping analyses) indicated a negative, nonzero pathway between institutional betrayal and trust in health care organizations (b = -0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-0.07, -0.02]), controlling for trust in physicians and hospitalization history. These negative effects were not buffered by trust in one's own physician, but in fact patients who trusted their physician more reported lower trust in health care organizations following negative medical events (interaction b = -0.02, 95%CI = [-0.03, -0.01]).
Conclusion: Clinical implications are discussed, concluding that institutional betrayal decreases patient trust and engagement in health care.
Keywords: USA; adherence; cross-sectional; engagement; healthcare systems; self-report; social science.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures

Similar articles
-
They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021 Jun 14;2:26330040211022033. doi: 10.1177/26330040211022033. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021. PMID: 37181101 Free PMC article.
-
Institutional Betrayal in Inpatient Psychiatry: Effects on Trust and Engagement With Care.Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Nov 12:appips20240022. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240022. Online ahead of print. Psychiatr Serv. 2024. PMID: 39529497
-
Young adults' expectations for healthcare following institutional betrayal.J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 May-Jun;25(3):299-314. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2022.2120151. Epub 2022 Sep 7. J Trauma Dissociation. 2024. PMID: 36073011
-
Institutional betrayal.Am Psychol. 2014 Sep;69(6):575-87. doi: 10.1037/a0037564. Am Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25197837 Review.
-
Considerations of Dissociation, Betrayal Trauma, and Complex Trauma in the Treatment of Incest.J Child Sex Abus. 2020 Aug-Sep;29(6):677-696. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1751369. Epub 2020 Jun 10. J Child Sex Abus. 2020. PMID: 32520663 Review.
Cited by
-
Gender, Campus Sexual Violence, Cultural Betrayal, Institutional Betrayal, and Institutional Support in U.S. Ethnic Minority College Students: A Descriptive Study.Violence Against Women. 2022 Jan;28(1):93-106. doi: 10.1177/1077801221998757. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Violence Against Women. 2022. PMID: 33851553 Free PMC article.
-
Referral pathways to early intervention services for psychosis and their influence on perceptions of care: An interpretive phenomenological analysis.Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13553. doi: 10.1111/eip.13553. Epub 2024 May 26. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 38797712 Free PMC article.
-
When Not to Ask: A Defense of Choice-Masking Nudges in Medical Research.J Health Care Law Policy. 2022;25(1):1-48. Epub 2022 Feb 9. J Health Care Law Policy. 2022. PMID: 37034557 Free PMC article.
-
Organizational Factors that Impact Trust in Healing Relationships: A Qualitative Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09783-1. Online ahead of print. J Gen Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 40775113
-
Clinician-associated traumatization from difficult medical encounters: Results from a qualitative interview study on the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes.SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Jun;3:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100237. Epub 2023 Feb 9. SSM Qual Res Health. 2023. PMID: 37426705 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smith SP. First, Do No Harm: Institutional Betrayal in Healthcare [dissertation] Eugene, OR: University of Oregon; 2016.
-
- Peabody FW. The care of the patient. J Am Med Assoc. 1927;88(12):877–882.
-
- Altice FL, Mostashari F, Friedland GH. Trust and the acceptance of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):47–58. - PubMed
-
- Tidkikis F, Strasen L. Patient-focused care units improve service and financial outcomes. Healthc Financial Manag. 1994;48(9):38. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources