Evidence and consensus recommendations for the pharmacological management of pain in India
- PMID: 28435313
- PMCID: PMC5386610
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S128655
Evidence and consensus recommendations for the pharmacological management of pain in India
Abstract
Despite enormous progress in the field of pain management over the recent years, pain continues to be a highly prevalent medical condition worldwide. In the developing countries, pain is often an undertreated and neglected aspect of treatment. Awareness issues and several misconceptions associated with the use of analgesics, fear of adverse events - particularly with opioids and surgical methods of analgesia - are major factors contributing to suboptimal treatment of pain. Untreated pain, as a consequence, is associated with disability, loss of income, unemployment and considerable mortality; besides contributing majorly to the economic burden on the society and the health care system in general. Available guidelines suggest that a strategic treatment approach may be helpful for physicians in managing pain in real-world settings. The aim of this manuscript is to propose treatment recommendations for the management of different types of pain, based on the available evidence. Evidence search was performed by using MEDLINE (by PubMed) and Cochrane databases. The types of articles included in this review were based on randomized control studies, case-control or cohort studies, prospective and retrospective studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based consensus recommendations. Articles were reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel and recommendations were developed. A stepwise treatment algorithm-based approach based on a careful diagnosis and evaluation of the underlying disease, associated comorbidities and type/duration of pain is proposed to assist general practitioners, physicians and pain specialists in clinical decision making.
Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; consensus recommendations; expert opinion; pain management; treatment algorithm.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Prashant Narang and Jaishid Ahdal are employees and/or shareholders of Johnson & Johnson Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Gur Prasad Dureja, Rajagopalan N Iyer, and Gautam Das report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Cleeland C, Ryan K. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–138. - PubMed
-
- Cleeland CS, Ryan K. The Brief Pain Inventory. Pain Research Group; 1991. [Accessed June 2016]. Available from: http://sosmanuals.com/manuals/cae48184b-7bae3b1d85105ea85375b60.pdf.
-
- Saxena A, Mendoza T, Cleeland CS. The assessment of cancer pain in north India: the validation of the Hindi Brief Pain Inventory – BPI-H. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1999;17(1):27–41. - PubMed
-
- Melzack R, Togerson WS. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology. 1971;34(1):50–59. - PubMed
-
- Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277–299. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
