Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):117-121.
doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16.

Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms

Affiliations

Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms

Hassan Al-Zoubi et al. Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the frequency of impacted maxillary canines using seven subtype classification system. For this purpose, impacted maxillary canines have been divided into seven various subtypes.

Materials and methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective study conducted using radiographic data of residents of Madinah, Al Munawwarah. Radiographic data of 14,000 patients, who attended College of Dentistry, Taibah University, from January 2011 to February 2015, were screened against the selection criteria for the presence of impacted teeth. The individuals with maxillary impacted canines were matched to maxillary canine impaction. The occurrence of each subtype of impacted canines was calculated.

Results: Impacted teeth are more common in the maxilla compared to mandible. The impacted canine represented the highest proportion of all impacted maxillary teeth followed by the second premolars and the central incisors. According to the classification system represented, Type II of canine impaction comprised the highest proportion (51%) while Type IV (0.5%) comprised the lowest frequency. The maxillary canine is the most frequently impacted tooth followed by mandibular canines.

Conclusions: Although there are many variations, the majority of impacted canines fall into Type II of the classification of impacted canines.

Keywords: Canine; impaction; maxillary teeth; orthodontics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the classification system of maxillary canine impaction used in this study: seven different types have been used based on anatomical relationship of impacted canines. Tooth 3 represents maxillary canine; teeth 2 and 4 represent maxillary lateral incisor and first premolar, respectively
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maxillary canine impaction classification. Type I (canine embedded between lateral incisor and first premolar); Type II (crown is mesially tipped overlapping, pressing lateral incisor tooth to provide a distal tipping of the lateral); Type III (distally tipped canine with an overlapped canine crown and the root of the first premolar); Type IV/V (canine long axis is orientated horizontally); Type VI (canine crown is directed up toward orbitale fossae); Type VII (canine long axis in horizontal direction with its crown placed buccally or interchanging with adjacent teeth)

References

    1. Bass TB. Observations on the misplaced upper canine tooth. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1967;18:25–33. - PubMed
    1. Pedro FL, Bandéca MC, Volpato LE, Marques AT, Borba AM, Musis CR, et al. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Brazilian subpopulation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15:209–13. - PubMed
    1. Röhrer A. Displaced and impacted canines A radiographic research. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr. 1929;15:1003–20.
    1. Chung DD, Weisberg M, Pagala M. Incidence and effects of genetic factors on canine impaction in an isolated Jewish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e331–5. - PubMed
    1. Sajnani AK, King NM. The sequential hypothesis of impaction of maxillary canine – A hypothesis based on clinical and radiographic findings. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:e375–85. - PubMed