Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017;21(1):1-5.
doi: 10.5114/wo.2017.66651. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

Programmed cell death 1 checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma

Affiliations
Review

Programmed cell death 1 checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma

Jacek Mackiewicz et al. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017.

Abstract

The treatment landscape of advanced melanoma has changed significantly following the discovery and marketing authorisation of immune checkpoints inhibitors. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) was the first one to be approved, and it. demonstrated long-term survival in about 20% of patients. Subsequently, anti-programmed cell death-1 (a-PD-1) antibodies (pembrolizuamb, nivolumab), inhibitors of PD-1/programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD1-L) synapse, showed higher clinical efficacy with lower toxicity comparing to ipilimumab. The highest clinical benefit in patients was observed when nivolumab and ipiliumumab were combined. However, the above strategy, due to very high toxicity, has limitations for use in all patients with advanced melanoma. Notwithstanding, patients treated with anti-PD1 beyond disease progression benefit from treatment continuation; further studies are warranted in this indication. Furthermore, patients responding to treatment with anti-PD1 will benefit from the therapy after its discontinuation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are clinically effective regardless of BRAF mutation. Currently there is no recommendation regarding which treatment option should be selected for the treatment of the population - immunotherapy or targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Randomised trials are ongoing comparing these two treatment strategies in patients with BRAF mutation. Encouraging results were observed in early phase trials in patients receiving the combination of immune and targeted therapy. Phase 3 studies are underway. Patients with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase present poor prognosis regardless of the systemic treatment used. novel treatment strategies should probably be developed for these patients.

Keywords: anti-PD1; immunotherapy; melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackiewicz J. What is new in the treatment of advanced melanoma? State of the art. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2012;16:363–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiater K, Switaj T, Mackiewicz J, et al. Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013;17:257–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival in data from phase II and III trials of ipilimumab in metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1558–68. - PMC - PubMed