Are p-values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of 'A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy" '
- PMID: 28436042
- PMCID: PMC5581266
- DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700031
Are p-values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of 'A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy" '
Keywords: Bayesian model averaging; Empirical Bayes; Hypothesis testing; p-values.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Author response to the contributors to the discussion on "A critical evaluation of the current 'p-value controversy'".Biom J. 2017 Sep;59(5):897-900. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700076. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Biom J. 2017. PMID: 28660641 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy".Biom J. 2017 Sep;59(5):854-872. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700001. Epub 2017 May 15. Biom J. 2017. PMID: 28504870 Review.
References
-
- Bernardo JM. Comment on article by Gelman. Bayesian Analysis. 2008;3:451–454. doi: 10.1214/08-BA318A. - DOI
-
- Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT. Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Statistical Science. 1999;14:382–401. doi: 10.1214/ss/1009212519. (corr. vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 193–195) - DOI
-
- Kuffner TA, Walker SG. Why are p-values controversial? American Statistician. 2017 doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1277161. (in press) - DOI
-
- Mayo DG. Don’t throw out the error control baby with the bad statistics bathwater. Online Discussion: ASA Statement on P-Values and Statistical Significance. 2016 http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108/su.... - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
