Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk
- PMID: 28436727
- DOI: 10.1177/2047487317695616
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk
Abstract
Aims Cardiovascular fixed-dose combination pills, or polypills, may help address the widespread lack of access and adherence to proven medicines. Initiation of polypill-based care typically entails switching from current separately taken medications. Given the heterogeneity in usual care, there is interest in the impact of polypill treatment across different patterns of prior medication regimen. Methods A total of 2004 participants with established cardiovascular disease or estimated 5-year cardiovascular risk of over 15% were randomised to polypill-based treatment (aspirin 75 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, lisinopril 10 mg and either atenolol 50 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg) or usual care. Baseline medications were classified by potency relative to polypill components. Estimated cardiovascular risk reduction was calculated by combining risk factor changes with results seen in meta-analyses of previous randomised trials. Results For cholesterol reduction conferred by polypills, there was a dose response across baseline statin groups, with mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol differences of 0.37, 0.22, 0.14 and 0.07 mmol/L among patients taking no statin, less potent, equipotent and more potent statin at baseline, respectively. Similarly there were differences in mean systolic BP of 5.4, 6.2, 3.3 and 1.8 mmHg among patients taking 0, 1, 2 or 3 BP-lowering agents. Among patients taking more potent statins at baseline, there was no significant difference in LDL-cholesterol but there were benefits for BP and aspirin adherence. Similar results were seen among patients taking 3 BP-lowering agents at baseline. Switching to a polypill-based strategy resulted in estimated cardiovascular relative risk reductions across a wide range of usual care patterns of antiplatelet, statin and BP-lowering therapy prescribing. Conclusion Adherence benefits from switching to a polypill resulted in risk factor changes that were at least as good as usual care across a wide variety of treatment patterns, including equally potent or more potent regimens. The benefits of switching to polypill-based care were greatest among those stepped up from partial treatment or less potent treatment.
Keywords: Antiplatelet; blood pressure-lowering agents; cardiovascular disease; fixed-dosed combination pill; polypill; prevention; statin.
Similar articles
-
A pragmatic randomized trial of a polypill-based strategy to improve use of indicated preventive treatments in people at high cardiovascular disease risk.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):920-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487314530382. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 24676715 Clinical Trial.
-
Estimated cardiovascular relative risk reduction from fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) treatment in a wide range of patients with a moderate risk of cardiovascular disease.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Aug;23(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1177/2047487315624523. Epub 2016 Jan 7. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26743587 Clinical Trial.
-
The evening versus morning polypill utilization study: the TEMPUS rationale and design.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):425-33. doi: 10.1177/2047487313476961. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 23382539 Clinical Trial.
-
A polypill for all? Critical review of the polypill literature for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke.Ann Pharmacother. 2012 May;46(5):688-95. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q621. Epub 2012 May 8. Ann Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 22570437 Review.
-
Improving cardiovascular protection: focus on a cardiovascular polypill.Future Cardiol. 2016 Mar;12(2):181-96. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.80. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Future Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26652213 Review.
Cited by
-
Fixed-dose combination therapy to reduce the growing burden of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries: feasibility and challenges.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jan;20(1):168-173. doi: 10.1111/jch.13162. Epub 2018 Jan 6. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018. PMID: 29316126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;3(3):CD009868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009868.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28263370 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill Strategy Compared With Separate Monocomponents in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease in Portugal: The MERCURY Study.J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Nov 22;9(2):134-146. doi: 10.36469/001c.39768. eCollection 2022. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022. PMID: 36475278 Free PMC article.
-
Compliance with the prescription of recommended medical therapy in trials comparing six versus 12 months or longer dual antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Oct;26(15):1673-1676. doi: 10.1177/2047487319829947. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30727767 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Polypill Trials for Stroke Prevention-Main Results, Critical Appraisal, and Implications for US Population.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Apr 15;20(5):10. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01031-9. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32296941 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical