Strategies for Enhancing Family Participation in Research in the ICU: Findings From a Qualitative Study
- PMID: 28438584
- PMCID: PMC5557665
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.004
Strategies for Enhancing Family Participation in Research in the ICU: Findings From a Qualitative Study
Abstract
Context: Family members of critically ill patients who participate in research focused on palliative care issues have been found to be systematically different from those who do not. These differences threaten the validity of research and raise ethical questions about worsening disparities in care by failing to represent diverse perspectives.
Objectives: This study's aims were to explore: 1) barriers and facilitators influencing family members' decisions to participate in palliative care research; and 2) potential methods to enhance research participation.
Methods: Family members who were asked to participate in a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a facilitator to improve clinician-family communication in the intensive care unit (ICU). Family members who participated (n = 17) and those who declined participation (n = 7) in Family Communication Study were interviewed about their recruitment experiences. We also included family members of currently critically ill patients to assess current experiences (n = 4). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Investigators used thematic analysis to identify factors influencing family members' decisions. Transcripts were co-reviewed to synthesize codes and themes.
Results: Three factors influencing participants' decisions were identified: Altruism, Research Experience, and Enhanced Resources. Altruism and Research Experience described intrinsic characteristics that are less amenable to strategies for improving participation rates. Enhanced Resources reflects families' desires for increased access to information and logistical and emotional support.
Conclusion: Family members found their recruitment experiences to be positive when staff were knowledgeable about the ICU, sensitive to the stressful circumstances, and conveyed a caring attitude. By training research staff to be supportive of families' emotional needs and need for logistical knowledge about the ICU, recruitment of a potentially more diverse sample of families may be enhanced.
Keywords: Critical care; ethics; palliative care; qualitative methods; research recruitment.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Echoes of isolation: Exploring Arab family perspectives and health care providers' reflections in ICU settings during critical care.Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e70001. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70001. Nurs Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 39995388
-
Clinician Perspectives on an Electronic Portal to Improve Communication with Patients and Families in the Intensive Care Unit.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Dec;13(12):2197-2206. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-351OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016. PMID: 27700144
-
Families' experiences of their interactions with staff in an Australian intensive care unit (ICU): a qualitative study.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Feb;31(1):51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Sep 20. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015. PMID: 25245202
-
Important clinician information needs about family members in the intensive care unit.J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Jul 31. J Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 26320406 Review.
-
Family members' perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: A systematic review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Jan;137:104391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104391. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023. PMID: 36442321
Cited by
-
Research participation in palliative medicine-benefits and barriers for patients and families: rapid review and thematic synthesis.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar;13(1):35-44. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003093. Epub 2021 Aug 17. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 34404745 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patients, family members and providers perceive family-administered delirium detection tools in the adult ICU as feasible and of value to patient care and family member coping: a qualitative focus group study.Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):358-366. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01866-3. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Can J Anaesth. 2021. PMID: 33210217 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 8;28(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00732-x. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32513204 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitating communication for critically ill patients and their family members: Study protocol for two randomized trials implemented in the U.S. and France.Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106465. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106465. Epub 2021 Jun 3. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 34091062 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical research for life-threatening illnesses requiring emergency hospitalisation: a critical interpretive synthesis of qualitative data related to the experience of participants and their caregivers.Trials. 2023 Feb 28;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07183-6. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36849961 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mehta S, Pelletier FQ, Brown M, et al. Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: A questionnaire study. Intensive Care Medicine. 2012;38:47–54. - PubMed
-
- Burns KEA, Prats CJ, Maione M, et al. The experience of surrogate decision makers on being approached for consent for patient participation in research: A multicenter study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;14:238–245. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical