Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;9(11):1064-1068.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013020. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

Flow diverter treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms

Affiliations
Review

Flow diverter treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms

Russell Cerejo et al. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial vertebral dissecting pseudoaneurysms are a rare, but increasingly recognized, cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The risks of aneurysm re-rupture and associated morbidity are high. The use of flow diverter stents for the treatment of these aneurysms has not been well studied.

Objective: To report our data and provide a summarized review of literature using flow diverter stents for the treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of flow diverter stents used for the treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms. Clinical, imaging, procedural, and follow-up data were collected.

Results: We identified eight vertebral dissecting pseudoaneurysms in seven patients (5 (71.4%) female; median age 47 years (IQR 46-52)) who had undergone treatment with flow diverter stents. In 4/7 patients (57.1%) the aneurysm had ruptured; however, only one was treated in the acute phase. Median size of the largest diameter of the aneurysm was 6.3 mm (IQR 4.2-8.8), and 7/8 aneurysms (87.5%) were treated with a single flow diverter device. Three aneurysms were concurrently coiled. Angiographic complete occlusion was seen in 6/8 (75%) aneurysms at a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR 7.7-20.2). Two patients had periprocedural strokes with transient neurologic deficits. All patients had a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2). There were no re-treatments or aneurysm ruptures during the follow-up period.

Conclusions: Our experience suggests that flow diverter stent treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms is safe, and associated with good occlusion rates and favorable clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Dissection; Flow Diverter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MB: Codman and Stryker consultant. Clinical Events Committee for the BARREL trial. MSH: Pulsar Inc, Clinical Events Committee. PR: Medtronic Neurovascular—Scientific Advisory Board; Genentech—consultant/honorarium; Nervive Medical—Scientific Advisory Board and stock holder; Perflow Medical—Scientific Advisory Board and stock holder; Stryker Neurovascular—Scientific Advisory Board. GT: Data Safety Monitoring Board for the COMPASS trial.

LinkOut - more resources