Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Mar;32(2):161-166.
doi: 10.5001/omj.2017.29.

Management of a Viable Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Management of a Viable Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report

Mini Mammen Roy et al. Oman Med J. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

The incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), which was extremely rare till recent times, has been rising steadily. We have more of such cases being published in medical literature now. A 38-year-old woman with a past history of previous three cesarean sections presented with five weeks pregnancy and complaints of bleeding per vaginum associated with mild lower abdominal discomfort. The diagnosis of CSP with a live fetus within the gestational sac was made on a transvaginal ultrasound examination and later confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The management involved injecting potassium chloride into the gestational sac and a combination of local and systemic methotrexate administration. The patient was followed-up by monitoring the beta human chorionic gonadotropin level until it reached non pregnant level and followed-up with scan and MRI until complete resolution of the pregnancy sac. Due to the rarity of this condition, there are no specific guidelines available for its management.

Keywords: Dilatation and Curettage; Laparoscopy; Methotrexate; Pregnancy, Ectopic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transvaginal scan showing the gestational sac with fetal pole at the scar area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transvaginal scan with a color doppler showing the gestational sac with a fetal pole at the previous scar area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transvaginal scan 16 weeks after the treatment showing a minimal hypoechoeic area at the scar area. The patient was initially using barrier method of contraception but later underwent laparoscopic tubal ligation.

References

    1. Tulpin L, Morel O, Malartic C, Barranger E. Conservative management of a Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Cases J 2009. Aug;2(8):7794. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus–an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J 1978. Jan;53(4):142-143. - PubMed
    1. Al-Nazer A, Omar L, Wahba M, Abbas T, Abdulkarim M. Ectopic intramural pregnancy developing at the site of a cesarean section scar: a case report. Cases J 2009. Dec;2(11):9404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muraji M, Mabuchi S, Hisamoto K, Muranishi M, Kanagawa T, Nishio Y, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies successfully treated with methotrexate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88(6):720-723. - PubMed
    1. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003. Mar;21(3):220-227. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources