Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil
- PMID: 28439425
- PMCID: PMC5392550
- DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2017.0003
Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil
Abstract
Objective: To establish reference charts for fetal biometric parameters in a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Southeast of Brazil.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among 5656 non-selected risk singleton pregnant women between 14 and 41 weeks of gestation. The ultrasound exams were performed during routine visits of second and third trimesters. Biparietal diameter (BPD) was measured at the level of the thalami and cavum septi pellucidi. Head circumference (HC) was calculated by the following formula: HC = 1.62*(BPD + occipital frontal diameter, OFD). Abdominal circumference (AC) was measured using the following formula: AC = (anteroposterior diameter + transverse abdominal diameter) × 1.57. Femur diaphysis length (FDL) was obtained in the longest axis of femur without including the distal femoral epiphysis. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) was obtained by the Hadlock formula. Polynomial regressions were performed to obtain the best-fit model for each fetal biometric parameter as the function of gestational age (GA).
Results: The mean, standard deviations (SD), minimum and maximum of BPD (cm), HC (cm), AC (cm), FDL (cm) and EFW (g) were 6.9 ± 1.9 (2.3 - 10.5), 24.51 ± 6.61 (9.1 - 36.4), 22.8 ± 7.3 (7.5 - 41.1), 4.9 ± 1.6 (1.2 - 8.1) and 1365 ± 1019 (103 - 4777), respectively. Second-degree polynomial regressions between the evaluated parameters and GA resulted in the following formulas: BPD = -4.044 + 0.540 × GA - 0.0049 × GA2 (R2 = 0.97); HC= -15.420 + 2.024 GA - 0.0199 × GA2 (R2 = 0.98); AC = -9.579 + 1.329 × GA - 0.0055 × GA2 (R2 = 0.97); FDL = -3.778 + 0.416 × GA - 0.0035 × GA2 (R2 = 0.98) and EFW = 916 - 123 × GA + 4.70 × GA2 (R2 = 0.96); respectively.
Conclusion: Reference charts for the fetal biometric parameters in a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Southeast of Brazil, were established.
Keywords: abdominal circumference; biparietal diameter; estimated fetal weight; femur diaphysis length; reference charts.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors do not report any financial or personal links with other persons or organizations, which might negatively affect the contents of this publication and/or claim authorship rights to this publication.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fetal Biometric Parameter Reference Charts of a Central Anatolian Turkish Population.Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55252. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38558579 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):719-726. doi: 10.1002/uog.15894. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26924421 Free PMC article.
-
Reference charts of fetal biometric parameters in 31,476 Brazilian singleton pregnancies.J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Jul;33(7):1185-91. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.7.1185. J Ultrasound Med. 2014. PMID: 24958405
-
Normal Fetal Growth Profile at 10-41 Weeks of Gestation - An Update Based on 10225 Normal Singleton Pregnancies and Measurement of the Fetal Parameters Using 3D Ultrasound.Ultraschall Med. 2023 Apr;44(2):179-187. doi: 10.1055/a-1968-0018. Epub 2023 Jan 1. Ultraschall Med. 2023. PMID: 36587624 English.
-
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355935 Review.
Cited by
-
Fetal Biometric Charts and Reference Equations for Pregnant Women Living in Port Said and Ismailia Governorates in Egypt.Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 May 14;6(5):751-756. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.179. eCollection 2018 May 20. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29875841 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal Biometric Parameter Reference Charts of a Central Anatolian Turkish Population.Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55252. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38558579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mayer C, Joseph KS. Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:136–145. - PubMed
-
- Skråstad RB, Eik-Nes SH, Sviggum O, Johansen OJ, Salvesen KÅ, Romundstad PR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of third-trimester routine ultrasound in a non-selected population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1353–1360. - PubMed
-
- Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, Michalitsi V, Panagopoulos P, Kassanos D. Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:915–920. - PubMed
-
- Jarvis S, Glinianaia SV, Torrioli MG, Platt MJ, Miceli M, Jouk PS, et al. Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study. Lancet. 2003;362:1106–1111. - PubMed
-
- Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1303–1307. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources