Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;45(2):103-107.
doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.80269. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of the Nasoenteric Tube

Affiliations

Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of the Nasoenteric Tube

Recai Dağlı et al. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of nasoenteric tube (NET) insertion into the postpyloric area using ultrasonography (USG) and compare with the commonly used method direct abdominal graphy.

Methods: A single anaesthesiologist placed all the NETs. The NET was visualised by two radiologists simultaneously using USG. The localisation of the tube was confirmed using an abdominal graph in all patients.

Results: The blind bedside method was used for NET insertion into 34 patients. Eleven of the tubes were detected passing through the postpyloric area using USG. In one case, the NET could not be visualised in the postpyloric area using USG; however, it was detected in the postpyloric area through control abdominal radiography. In 22 patients, NETs were detected in the stomach using control abdominal radiography. The rate of imaging post pyloric using USG was 91.6%. When all cases were considered, catheter localisation was detected accurately using USG by 97% (33 in 34 patients).

Conclusion: USG is a reliable and practical alternative to radiography, which can be used to detect localisation of the nasogastric tube and NET.

Keywords: Nasoenteric tube; aspiration; enteral feeding; radiography; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Control graphs
Figure 2
Figure 2
NET that forms double linear echogenic view is observed in the examination carried out with 3.5 MHz convex probe
Figure 3
Figure 3
Axial section view of the NET is observed with 7.5 MHz linear probe

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1495–501. - PubMed
    1. Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut. 2003;52(Suppl VII):vii1–vii12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition:Intensive care. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:210–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guanter P, Krenitsky J, et al. ASPEN Board of directors. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:122–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607108330314. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kabaçam G, Özden A. Enteral Tüple Beslenme. Güncel Gastroenteroloji. 2009;13:201–10.

LinkOut - more resources