High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction
- PMID: 28439635
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4555-1
High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate tunnel position and width in failed primary single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. It was hypothesized that both femoral and tibial bone tunnels are frequently malplaced in terms of a partially anatomic position in the setting of failed SB ACL reconstruction.
Methods: Patients with recurrent instability following isolated SB ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts, undergoing revision ACL surgery, were retrospectively included. Further inclusion criteria were age >18 years and availability of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs of the affected knee. Patients with multiligamentous instabilities as well as incomplete or poor radiographs were excluded. Tunnel position was evaluated according to the method described by Harner et al. and Stäubli and Rauschning. Tunnel width was determined on CT scans perpendicular to the bone tunnel axis at three different heights of each bone tunnel.
Results: Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered for radiological analysis. Femoral tunnels were graded as anatomic in 60% (49 of 82) of all cases. In the remaining 40% (33/82), 27% of the tunnels were placed partially anatomic and 13% were graded as non-anatomic. Tibial tunnel placement was found to be anatomic in 54% (44/82) of all cases, partially anatomic in 45% and non-anatomic in 1% of the cases. No statistically significant difference between anatomic or partially anatomic tunnel position and tunnel diameter, neither for the femoral nor for the tibial side, was observed (n.s.).
Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that there is a high incidence of partially anatomic placed tunnels in failed SB ACL reconstruction. Tunnel width was not associated with tunnel position. Clinically, partially anatomic bone tunnels frequently require a staged procedure with bone grafting and subsequent ACL revision surgery. Thus, surgeons should carefully analyse tunnel position and width preoperatively to properly plan ACL revision surgery.
Keywords: ACL; Anatomic; Anterior cruciate; Knee; Ligament reconstruction; Revision; Single-bundle; Tunnel placement.
Similar articles
-
Is intraoperative fluoroscopy necessary in anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction? A prospective randomized controlled trial.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1093-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Jun 8. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31186180 Clinical Trial.
-
Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1679-89. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4847-7. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27106125 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral and tibial graft tunnel parameters after transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2250-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515590221. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26138734
-
Tunnel widening in single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Apr;25(4):1316-1327. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4204-0. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27329174 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):664-70. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2014-6. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 22527419 Review.
Cited by
-
One-Stage ACL Revision Using a Bone Allograft Plug for a Semianatomic Tibial Tunnel That Is Too Anterior.Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Feb 28;11(3):e463-e469. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.11.019. eCollection 2022 Mar. Arthrosc Tech. 2022. PMID: 35256992 Free PMC article.
-
[Mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament revision].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 15;35(1):58-63. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202008125. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 33448200 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Chinese expert consensus on failure and revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Orthop Translat. 2025 May 23;52:451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 May. J Orthop Translat. 2025. PMID: 40503214 Free PMC article.
-
Posteriorly positioned femoral grafts decrease long-term failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral and tibial graft positions did not affect long-term reported outcome.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2003-2013. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06871-1. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 35112176 Free PMC article.
-
Proximally positioned femoral grafts decrease passive anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal.Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2641-2652. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06271-9. Epub 2024 Aug 27. Int Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39190104
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous