90-day Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in New York State Between 2005 and 2014: A 10-year Analysis of a Statewide Cohort
- PMID: 28441307
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002208
90-day Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in New York State Between 2005 and 2014: A 10-year Analysis of a Statewide Cohort
Abstract
MINI: We assessed 90-day readmission and evaluated risk factors associated with readmission after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in New York State. The overall 90-day readmission rate was 24.8%. Age, sex, race, insurance, procedure, number of operated spinal levels, health service area, and comorbidities are major risk factors for 90-day readmission.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess 90-day readmission and evaluate risk factors associated with readmission after lumbar fusion in New York State.
Summary of background data: Readmission is becoming an important metric for quality and efficiency of health care. Readmission and its predictors following spine surgery are overall poorly understood and limited evidence is available specifically in lumbar fusion.
Methods: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was utilized to capture patients undergoing lumbar fusion from 2005 to 2014. Temporal trend of 90-day readmission was assessed using Cochran-Armitage test. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors associated with 90-day readmission.
Results: There were 86,869 patients included in this cohort study. The overall 90-day readmission rate was 24.8%. On a multivariable analysis model, age (odds ratio [OR] comparing ≥75 versus <35 years: 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.35), sex (OR female to male: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.15-1.23), race (OR African-American to white: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.52-1.69), insurance (OR Medicaid to Medicare: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.33-1.53), procedure (OR comparing thoracolumbar fusion, combined [International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, ICD-9: 81.04] to posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar spinal fusion [ICD-9: 81.08]: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.49-2.97), number of operated spinal levels (OR comparing four to eight vertebrae to two to three vertebrae: 2.39, 95% CI: 2.07-2.77), health service area ([HSA]; OR comparing Finger Lakes to New York-Pennsylvania border: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61-0.73), and comorbidity, i.e., coronary artery disease (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.19-1.33) were significantly associated with 90-day readmission. Directions of the odds ratios for these factors were consistent after stratification by procedure type.
Conclusion: Age, sex, race, insurance, procedure, number of operated spinal levels, HSA, and comorbidities are major risk factors for 90-day readmission. Our study allows risk calculation to determine high-risk patients before undergoing spinal fusion surgery to prevent early readmission, improve quality of care, and reduce health care expenditures.
Level of evidence: 3.
Similar articles
-
Sociodemographic Characteristics Predict Readmission Rates After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):364-377. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny316. Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 30726963
-
The Impact of Obesity on Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Elective Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Apr 1;46(7):457-463. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003812. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 33181774
-
Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):432-441. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002850. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 30138253
-
The economic burden of diabetes in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):935-953. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w. Epub 2025 Jan 3. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39751814
-
30- and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2480-2489. doi: 10.1177/21925682241306358. Epub 2024 Dec 4. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39630980 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Early Readmission and Reoperation After Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Incidence and Risk Factors.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 25;15:2233-2242. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S388020. eCollection 2022. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022. PMID: 36457819 Free PMC article.
-
Readmissions after elective orthopedic surgery in a comprehensive co-management care system-a retrospective analysis.Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 15;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00218-z. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34906233 Free PMC article.
-
Ninety-Day Readmission in Elective Revision Lumbar Fusion Surgery in the Inpatient Setting.Global Spine J. 2020 Dec;10(8):1027-1033. doi: 10.1177/2192568219886535. Epub 2019 Nov 10. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32875826 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-operative bone quality deficits and risk of complications following spine fusion surgery among postmenopausal women.Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06963-9. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Osteoporos Int. 2024. PMID: 37932510 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Isolated Baseline Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):57-62. Iowa Orthop J. 2022. PMID: 35821925 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, et al. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:2707–2714.
-
- Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:67–76.
-
- Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, et al. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18:1463–1470.
-
- Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1418–1428.
-
- Torio CM AR. National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011. [serial online] 2013. Available from: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville. Accessed.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials