Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0168223.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168223. eCollection 2017.

A population-based approach for implementing change from opt-out to opt-in research permissions

Affiliations

A population-based approach for implementing change from opt-out to opt-in research permissions

Elizabeth A Marshall et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Due to recently proposed changes in the Common Rule regarding the collection of research preferences, there is an increased need for efficient methods to document opt-in research preferences at a population level. Previously, our institution developed an opt-out paper-based workflow that could not be utilized for research in a scalable fashion. This project was designed to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing an electronic health record (EHR)-based active opt-in research preferences program. The first phase of implementation required creating and disseminating a patient questionnaire through the EHR portal to populate discreet fields within the EHR indicating patients' preferences for future research study contact (contact) and their willingness to allow anonymised use of excess tissue and fluid specimens (biobank). In the second phase, the questionnaire was presented within a clinic nurse intake workflow in an obstetrical clinic. These permissions were tabulated in registries for use by investigators for feasibility studies and recruitment. The registry was also used for research patient contact management using a new EHR encounter type to differentiate research from clinical encounters. The research permissions questionnaire was sent to 59,670 patients via the EHR portal. Within four months, 21,814 responses (75% willing to participate in biobanking, and 72% willing to be contacted for future research) were received. Each response was recorded within a patient portal encounter to enable longitudinal analysis of responses. We obtained a significantly lower positive response from the 264 females who completed the questionnaire in the obstetrical clinic (55% volunteers for biobank and 52% for contact). We demonstrate that it is possible to establish a research permissions registry using the EHR portal and clinic-based workflows. This patient-centric, population-based, opt-in approach documents preferences in the EHR, allowing linkage of these preferences to health record information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: KTB is the principal investigator for the NIH - NCATS Grant Number UL1 TR001450 which allowed for partial operational funding for this project for co-Authors JCO, JSO, and LAL. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Active opt-out paper form.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Research contact encounter.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Patient portal notification email.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Patient portal message.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Research preferences questionnaire.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Reminder message.
Fig 7
Fig 7. “Not ready” message.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Questionnaire workflow.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Registry process flow.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Questionnaire response over time.

References

    1. Imagine MUSC 2020 [Internet]. [cited 3 Jun 2016]. http://www.imaginemusc.com/
    1. Overby CL, Maloney KA, Alestock TD, Chavez J, Berman D, Sharaf RM, et al. Prioritizing Approaches to Engage Community Members and Build Trust in Biobanks: A Survey of Attitudes and Opinions of Adults within Outpatient Practices at the University of Maryland. J Pers Med. 2015;5: 264–279. 10.3390/jpm5030264 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahm AK, Wrenn M, Carroll NM, Feigelson HS. Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding. J Community Genet. 2013;4: 445–450. 10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emanuel EJ. Reform of Clinical Research Regulations, Finally. N Engl J Med. 2015; - PubMed
    1. Kaiser J. HUMAN SUBJECTS. Researchers decry consent proposal. Science. 2016;352: 878–879. 10.1126/science.352.6288.878 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources