Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue
- PMID: 28441403
- PMCID: PMC5404887
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175737
Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore differences between male and female patients entering a rehabilitation program at a pain clinic in order to gain a greater understanding of different approaches to be used in rehabilitation.
Method: 1371 patients referred to a specialty pain rehabilitation clinic, completed sociodemographic and pain related questionnaires. They rated their pain acceptance (CPAQ-8), their kinesiophobia (TSK), the impact of pain in their life (MPI), anxiety and depression levels (HAD) and quality of life scales: the SF-36, LiSat-11, and the EQ-5D. Because of the large sample size of the study, the significance level was set at the p ≤.01.
Results: Analysis by t-test showed that when both sexes experience the same pain severity, women report significantly higher activity level, pain acceptance and social support while men report higher kinesiophobia, mood disturbances and lower activity level.
Conclusion: Pain acceptance (CPAQ-8) and kinesiophobia (TSK) showed the clearest differences between men and women. Pain acceptance and kinesiophobia are behaviorally defined and have the potential to be changed.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ).Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Feb;35(4):306-14. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.694572. Epub 2012 Jun 25. Disabil Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 22726109
-
Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort.J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):73-80. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1227. J Rehabil Med. 2014. PMID: 24036958
-
Willing and able: a closer look at pain Willingness and Activity Engagement on the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8).J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.004. J Pain. 2013. PMID: 23452647
-
Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 in an Australian pain clinic sample.Int J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9278-6. Int J Behav Med. 2014. PMID: 23179676
-
A review of the use and psychometric properties of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaires.Rehabil Psychol. 2021 Feb;66(1):102-105. doi: 10.1037/rep0000342. Rehabil Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33591792 Review.
Cited by
-
Pain intensity and psychological distress show different associations with interference and lack of life control: A clinical registry-based cohort study of >40,000 chronic pain patients from SQRP.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 2;4:1093002. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1093002. eCollection 2023. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36937562 Free PMC article.
-
Biopsychosocial Approach in Identifying Risk Factors of Kinesiophobia in Persons with Subacromial Pain Syndrome and Developing a Clinical Prediction Tool.Indian J Orthop. 2022 Nov 25;57(1):124-136. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00781-7. eCollection 2023 Jan. Indian J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36660479 Free PMC article.
-
Senior WISE intervention: Gender differences in bodily pain and trait anxiety.Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021 Aug;35(4):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 11. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34176575 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sex Differences in Pain Scores and Medication Consumption for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.Diseases. 2024 Dec 3;12(12):314. doi: 10.3390/diseases12120314. Diseases. 2024. PMID: 39727644 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Hip Preservation Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iowa Orthop J. 2023 Dec;43(2):133-145. Iowa Orthop J. 2023. PMID: 38213859 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European journal of pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. European spine journal. 2006;15(6):834–48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gerdle B, Björk J, Henriksson C, Bengtsson A. Prevalence of current and chronic pain and their influences upon work and healthcare-seeking: a population study. The Journal of rheumatology. 2004;31(7):1399–406. - PubMed
-
- Haukenes I, Hensing G, Stålnacke B-M, Hammarström A. Does pain severity guide selection to multimodal pain rehabilitation across gender? European Journal of Pain. 2015;19(6):826–33. doi: 10.1002/ejp.609 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stubbs D, Krebs E, Bair M, Damush T, Wu J, Sutherland J, et al. Sex Differences in Pain and Pain‐Related Disability among Primary Care Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Pain Medicine. 2010;11(2):232–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00760.x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical