Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0175737.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175737. eCollection 2017.

Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue

Affiliations

Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue

Graciela S Rovner et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore differences between male and female patients entering a rehabilitation program at a pain clinic in order to gain a greater understanding of different approaches to be used in rehabilitation.

Method: 1371 patients referred to a specialty pain rehabilitation clinic, completed sociodemographic and pain related questionnaires. They rated their pain acceptance (CPAQ-8), their kinesiophobia (TSK), the impact of pain in their life (MPI), anxiety and depression levels (HAD) and quality of life scales: the SF-36, LiSat-11, and the EQ-5D. Because of the large sample size of the study, the significance level was set at the p ≤.01.

Results: Analysis by t-test showed that when both sexes experience the same pain severity, women report significantly higher activity level, pain acceptance and social support while men report higher kinesiophobia, mood disturbances and lower activity level.

Conclusion: Pain acceptance (CPAQ-8) and kinesiophobia (TSK) showed the clearest differences between men and women. Pain acceptance and kinesiophobia are behaviorally defined and have the potential to be changed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European journal of pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. European spine journal. 2006;15(6):834–48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerdle B, Björk J, Henriksson C, Bengtsson A. Prevalence of current and chronic pain and their influences upon work and healthcare-seeking: a population study. The Journal of rheumatology. 2004;31(7):1399–406. - PubMed
    1. Haukenes I, Hensing G, Stålnacke B-M, Hammarström A. Does pain severity guide selection to multimodal pain rehabilitation across gender? European Journal of Pain. 2015;19(6):826–33. doi: 10.1002/ejp.609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stubbs D, Krebs E, Bair M, Damush T, Wu J, Sutherland J, et al. Sex Differences in Pain and Pain‐Related Disability among Primary Care Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Pain Medicine. 2010;11(2):232–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00760.x - DOI - PubMed