Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 22;22(4):669.
doi: 10.3390/molecules22040669.

Polyphenolic Compounds and Digestive Enzymes: In Vitro Non-Covalent Interactions

Affiliations
Review

Polyphenolic Compounds and Digestive Enzymes: In Vitro Non-Covalent Interactions

Alejandra I Martinez-Gonzalez et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

The digestive enzymes-polyphenolic compounds (PCs) interactions behind the inhibition of these enzymes have not been completely studied. The existing studies have mainly analyzed polyphenolic extracts and reported inhibition percentages of catalytic activities determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy techniques. Recently, pure PCs and new methods such as isothermal titration calorimetry and circular dichroism have been applied to describe these interactions. The present review focuses on PCs structural characteristics behind the inhibition of digestive enzymes, and progress of the used methods. Some characteristics such as molecular weight, number and position of substitution, and glycosylation of flavonoids seem to be related to the inhibitory effect of PCs; also, this effect seems to be different for carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes and proteases. The digestive enzyme-PCs molecular interactions have shown that non-covalent binding, mostly by van der Waals forces, hydrogen binding, hydrophobic binding, and other electrostatic forces regulate them. These interactions were mainly associated to non-competitive type inhibitions of the enzymatic activities. The present review emphasizes on the digestive enzymes such as α-glycosidase (AG), α-amylase (PA), lipase (PL), pepsin (PE), trypsin (TP), and chymotrypsin (CT). Existing studies conducted in vitro allow one to elucidate the characteristics of the structure-function relationships, where differences between the structures of PCs might be the reason for different in vivo effects.

Keywords: digestive enzymes; enzymatic inhibition; hydrogen binding; hydrophobic binding; polyphenolic compounds; structure; van der Waals forces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The chemical structures of some representative polyphenolic compounds examples, (a) gallic acid; (b) p-coumaric acid; (c) luteolin (d) quercetin; (e) (−)-epicatechin; (f) cyanidin-3-o-glucoside; (g) ellagic acid; and (h) proanthocyanidin A1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of digestive enzymatic activity. An abstract of main carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes, α-glucosidase and α-amylases isoforms, over starch is presented.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three-dimensional structures of digestive enzymes: (a) α-glucosidase (PDB accession No.: 2QLY); (b) pancreatic α-amylase (No.: 1PIF2); (c) pancreatic lipase (No.: 1ETH); (d) pepsin (No.: 1YX9) and (e) trypsin (No.: 1S81). Domains A, B and C are presented in yellow, red and green colors, respectively; while domains D and E of α-glucosidase are presented in orange and gray colors, respectively. Colipase in pancreatic lipase is presented in blue color. The amino acid residues from the active site of each enzyme are colored: pink for Asp, blue for Glu, aquamarine for Ser, and purple for His. Ca2+ ion is a green-colored dot.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Non-covalent binding involves in the PCs–enzymes interactions. Examples of (a) van der Waals forces; (b) hydrogen binding; (c) hydrophobic binding; and (d) electrostatic forces. The protein chain is represented by R and curved line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang W.-Y., Cai Y.-Z., Zhang Y. Natural Phenolic Compounds From Medicinal Herbs and Dietary Plants: Potential Use for Cancer Prevention. Nutr. Cancer. 2009;62:1–20. doi: 10.1080/01635580903191585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acosta-Estrada B.A., Gutiérrez-Uribe J.A., Serna-Saldívar S.O. Bound phenolics in foods, a review. Food Chem. 2014;152:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. González-Castejón M., Rodriguez-Casado A. Dietary phytochemicals and their potential effects on obesity: A review. Pharmacol. Res. 2011;64:438–455. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.07.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchholz T., Melzig M.F. Polyphenolic Compounds as Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitors. Planta Med. 2015;81:771–783. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546173. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai Y., Luo Q., Sun M., Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004;74:2157–2184. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources