Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
- PMID: 28442952
- PMCID: PMC5389232
- DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.203017
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for upper teeth extractions.
Materials and methods: Forty-five patients were included in the articaine 4% group, and 45 in the mepivacaine 2% control group. After all injections, soft and hard tissue numbness was objectively gauged by dental probe at intervals of 15 s. Furthermore, the discomfort of the injections were recorded by the patients after each treatment on standard 100 mm visual analog scales, tagged at the endpoints with "no pain" (0 mm) and "unbearable pain" (100 mm).
Results: There were significant differences in the meantime of first numbness to associated palatal mucosa and tooth of patients between mepivacaine and articaine buccal infiltration (BI) groups P = 0.01 and 0.01. Patients in the articaine group recorded earlier palatal mucosa and teeth numbness than those in the mepivacaine group. With regards to the discomfort of the needle injections, palatal injection was significantly more painful than BI (t-test: P < 0.001). Articaine buccal injection was significantly more painful than mepivacaine buccal injection (t-test: P <0.001). However, articaine palatal injection was less painful than articaine BI. Clinically, anesthesia onset time was faster in anterior upper teeth than upper middle and posterior teeth.
Conclusions: BIs with 4% articaine was faster in achieving palate and teeth anesthesia than 2% mepivacaine for extraction of upper maxillary teeth. Patients in mepivacaine BI and articaine palatal injection groups reported less pain with needle injection. Failure of anesthesia was noticeable with maxillary multiple-rooted teeth.
Keywords: Articaine; buccal infiltration; mepivacaine; needle discomfort; teeth extraction.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery.Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):571-577. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_259_18. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 30429739 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial.Eur J Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):201-206. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156811. Eur J Dent. 2015. PMID: 26038650 Free PMC article.
-
Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Sep 30;9(3):e5. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2018.9305. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018. PMID: 30429965 Free PMC article.
-
Can Single Buccal Infiltration With 4% Articaine Induce Sufficient Analgesia for the Extraction of Maxillary Teeth? A Systematic Literature Review.Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42975. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37671226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can single buccal infiltration with 4% articaine induce sufficient analgesia for the extraction of primary molars in children: a systematic literature review.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):179-186. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.179. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934983 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(7):CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29990391 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of painless STA on tooth extraction of elderly patients with periodontal diseases.Exp Ther Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):2956-2960. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5776. Epub 2018 Jan 19. Exp Ther Med. 2018. PMID: 29541167 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Aug;22(4):239-254. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.4.239. Epub 2022 Jul 26. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 35991357 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth.Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):297-301. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_94_20. Epub 2020 May 30. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 32934619 Free PMC article.
-
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery.Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):571-577. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_259_18. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 30429739 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stenebrand A, Hakeberg M, Helkimo AN, Koch G, Boman UW. Dental anxiety and oral health in 15-year-olds: A repeated cross-sectional study over 30 years. Community Dent Health. 2015;32:221–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous