Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 11:8:556.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00556. eCollection 2017.

Gih (Qi): Beyond Affordance

Affiliations

Gih (Qi): Beyond Affordance

Yang Lee et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Ancient Eastern thought posited the ontological integration of the "mind-body world". The body-mind syncretism was a foundational precept in Eastern philosophy in which "Gih" ("Qi") was considered the basic entity of the universe and the human being. This study attempts to build a meta-theory and to demonstrate empirical designs for Gih, discussing the problems of the mind and body, or the subject and object, compared with the concept of "affordance" proposed by ecological approaches. The notion of Gih extends beyond that of affordance in that Gih activates a psychosomatic process between the physical condition and the mental state that facilitates the bi-directional interactions between subject and object. Therefore, the concept of Gih integrates mind and body, providing a means of comparing Eastern and Western philosophical systems.

Keywords: Gih (Qi); affordance; eastern philosophy; ecological psychology; embodied cognition; mind–body problem; perception and action.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chemero A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15 181–195. 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5 - DOI
    1. Choi H. (1857). Discipline of Gih. Seoul: Yeogang Publisher.
    1. Davis J. I., Markman A. B. (2012). Embodied cognition as a practical paradigm: introduction to the topic, the future of embodied cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4 685–691. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01227.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dotov D. G., de Wit M. M., Lin N. (2012). Understanding affordances; history and contemporary development of Gibson’s central concept. J. Philos. Interdiscip. Vanguard 3 28–39.
    1. Ellis B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LinkOut - more resources