Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 7:20:115-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.04.003. eCollection 2017 May.

The gynecologic oncology fellowship interview process: Challenges and potential areas for improvement

Gregory M Gressel  1 , Anne Van Arsdale  1 , Shayan M Dioun  1 , Gary L Goldberg  1   2 , Nicole S Nevadunsky  1   2
Affiliations

The gynecologic oncology fellowship interview process: Challenges and potential areas for improvement

Gregory M Gressel et al. Gynecol Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

The application and interview process for gynecologic oncology fellowship is highly competitive, time-consuming and expensive for applicants. We conducted a survey of successfully matched gynecologic oncology fellowship applicants to assess problems associated with the interview process and identify areas for improvement. All Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) list-serve members who have participated in the match program for gynecologic oncology fellowship were asked to complete an online survey regarding the interview process. Linear regression modeling was used to examine association between year of match, number of programs applied to, cost incurred, and overall satisfaction. Two hundred and sixty-nine eligible participants reported applying to a mean of 20 programs [range 1-45] and were offered a mean of 14 interviews [range 1-43]. They spent an average of $6000 [$0-25,000], using personal savings (54%), credit cards (50%), family support (12%) or personal loans (3%). Seventy percent of respondents identified the match as fair, and 93% were satisfied. Interviewees spent a mean of 15 [0-45] days away from work and 37% reported difficulty arranging coverage. Linear regression showed an increase in number of programs applied to and cost per applicant over time (p < 0.001) between 1993 and 2016. Applicants who applied to all available programs spent more (p < 0.001) than those who applied to programs based on their location or quality. The current fellowship match was identified as fair and satisfying by most respondents despite being time consuming and expensive. Suggested alternative options included clustering interviews geographically or conducting preliminary interviews at the SGO Annual Meeting.

Keywords: Fellowship interview; Fellowship training; Gynecologic oncology; Quality-of-life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative quotes from respondents regarding benefits of the current fellowship matching process.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative quotes from respondents regarding disadvantages of the current fellowship matching process.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative quotes from respondents regarding ways to improve the current fellowship matching process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bernacki K.D., McKenna B.J., Myers J.L. Challenges and opportunities in the application process for fellowship training in pathology: an independent survey of residents and fellows demonstrates limited interest in an NRMP-style matching program. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012;137(4):543–552. - PubMed
    1. Cannada L.K., Luhmann S.J., Hu S.S., Quinn R.H. The fellowship match process: the history and a report of the current experience. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am. Vol.) 2015;97(1) - PubMed
    1. Frishman G.N., Bell C.L., Botros S. Applying to subspecialty fellowship: clarifying the confusion and conflicts! Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;214(2):243–246. - PubMed
    1. Hammoud D.A., Yousem D.M., Schaefer P.W. Neuroradiology fellowship match: year 4 applicants' perceptions. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2005;2(8):696–700. - PubMed
    1. Iqbal I.J., Sareen P., Shoup B., Muffly T. Attributes of successfully matched versus unmatched obstetrics and gynecology fellowship applicants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014;210(6):567.e1–567.e8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources