Reply to A Mackie

Affiliations

Comment

Marleen Jansen. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun.

. 2017 Jun;25(7):791-792.

doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.68. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

¹ Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

International differences in the evaluation of conditions for newborn bloodspot screening: a review of scientific literature and policy documents.
Jansen ME, Metternick-Jones SC, Lister KJ. Jansen ME, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;25(1):10-16. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.126. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 27848945 Free PMC article.
UK National Screening Committee Criteria: clarification of two misunderstandings.
Mackie A. Mackie A. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(7):791. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.56. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28443621 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

1. Cornel MC, Rigter T, Weinreich SS et al: A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 22: 12–17. - PMC - PubMed
1. Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Loeber JG et al: Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39: 171–187. - PubMed
1. Grosse SD, Boyle CA, Kenneson A, Khoury MJ, Wilfond BS: From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 923–929. - PubMed