Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;25(7):816-822.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.57. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

The RUDY study: using digital technologies to enable a research partnership

Harriet J A Teare  1 , Joanna Hogg  2 , Jane Kaye  1 , Raashid Luqmani  2 , Elaine Rush  3 , Alison Turner  2 , Laura Watts  2 , Melanie Williams  3 , M Kassim Javaid  2
Affiliations

The RUDY study: using digital technologies to enable a research partnership

Harriet J A Teare et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Patients have extensive experience of their disease that can enhance the design and execution of research leading to significant innovations and efficiencies in the research process. The research community on the whole have been slow to adopt practices that enable patients to become active partners in research. Digital technologies are providing the means to do this more easily and so are increasingly being used to interact with patients and involve them in the design and execution of research. The RUDY (Rare UK Diseases of bone, joints and blood vessels) study's pioneering approach applies a custom-developed electronic platform where patients can contribute information over time about their disease experience, lifestyle and clinical history. This is combined with a state-of-the-art Dynamic Consent model and a commitment to patient-driven research, to further our understanding of rare diseases. This paper describes the RUDY study and the benefits that have been gained from adopting this partnership approach to research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example pages on the RUDY study platform. (a) Rudy front page. (b) Participant profile page. (c) Fracture event page. (d) Participant to do list.
Figure 2
Figure 2
RUDY study governance structure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allison M: Can web 2.0 reboot clinical trials? Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27: 895–902. - PubMed
    1. Katz S, Moyer C: The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 978–983. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Middleton A, Bragin E, Parker M: Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics—recruitment strategies for social sciences research. J Community Genet 2014; 5: 291–302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K: Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23: 141–146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pattaro C, Gögele M, Mascalzoni D et al: The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study: rationale, objectives, and preliminary results. J Transl Med 2015; 13: 348. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms