Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;108(3):246-254.
doi: 10.5935/abc.20170027.

Prognostic Factors in Severe Chagasic Heart Failure

[Article in Portuguese, English]
Affiliations

Prognostic Factors in Severe Chagasic Heart Failure

[Article in Portuguese, English]
Sandra de Araújo Costa et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Prognostic factors are extensively studied in heart failure; however, their role in severe Chagasic heart failure have not been established.

Objectives: To identify the association of clinical and laboratory factors with the prognosis of severe Chagasic heart failure, as well as the association of these factors with mortality and survival in a 7.5-year follow-up.

Methods: 60 patients with severe Chagasic heart failure were evaluated regarding the following variables: age, blood pressure, ejection fraction, serum sodium, creatinine, 6-minute walk test, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, QRS width, indexed left atrial volume, and functional class.

Results: 53 (88.3%) patients died during follow-up, and 7 (11.7%) remained alive. Cumulative overall survival probability was approximately 11%. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (HR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.04 - 4.31; p<0.05) and indexed left atrial volume ≥ 72 mL/m2 (HR = 3.51; 95% CI: 1.63 - 7.52; p<0.05) were the only variables that remained as independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusions: The presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter and indexed left atrial volume > 72 mL/m2 are independent predictors of mortality in severe Chagasic heart failure, with cumulative survival probability of only 11% in 7.5 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative overall survival curve.

References

    1. Bocchi EA, Marcondes-Braga FG, Ayub-Ferreira SM, Rohde LE, Oliveira WA, Almeida DR, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia III Brazilian guidelines on chronic heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009;93(1) Suppl. 1:3–70. - PubMed
    1. Albuquerque DC, Souza JD, Neto, Bacal F, Rohde LE, Bernardez-Pereira S, Berwanger O, et al. Investigadores Estudo BREATHE I Brazilian Registry of Heart Failure - Clinical Aspects, Care Quality and Hospitalization Outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;104(6):433–442. Erratum in: Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;105(2):208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nogueira PR, Rassi S, Correa K de S. Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic profile of heart failure in a tertiary hospital. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;95(3):392–398. - PubMed
    1. Bocchi EA, Marcondes-Braga FG, Bacal F, Ferraz AS, Albuquerque D, Rodrigues D de A, et al. Updating of the Brazilian guideline for chronic heart failure - 2012. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012;98(1) Suppl 1:1–33. - PubMed
    1. Areosa CM, Almeida DR, Carvalho AC, De-Paola AA. Evaluation of heart failure prognostic factors in patients referred for heart transplantation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(6):667–673. - PubMed

MeSH terms