Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1569-1575.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx193.

Efficacy of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome: final overall survival from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 RADIANT-2 study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome: final overall survival from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 RADIANT-2 study

M E Pavel et al. Ann Oncol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: In the phase 3 RADIANT-2 study, everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) showed improvement of 5.1 months in median progression-free survival versus placebo plus octreotide LAR among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors associated with carcinoid syndrome. The progression-free survival P-value was marginally above the prespecified threshold for statistical significance. Here, we report final overall survival (OS) and key safety update from RADIANT-2.

Patients and methods: The RADIANT-2 trial compared everolimus (10 mg/day, orally; n = 216) versus placebo (n = 213), both in conjunction with octreotide LAR (30 mg, intramuscularly, every 28 days). Patients, unblinded at the time of progression or after end of double-blind core phase following primary analysis, were offered open-label everolimus with octreotide LAR (open-label phase). In the open-label phase, patients had similar safety and efficacy assessments as those in the core phase. For OS, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using unadjusted Cox model and a Cox model adjusted for prespecified baseline covariates were calculated.

Results: A total of 170 patients received open-label everolimus (143 crossed over from the placebo arm; 27 in the everolimus arm continued to receive the same treatment after unblinding). The median OS (95% CI) after 271 events was 29.2 months (23.8-35.9) for the everolimus arm and 35.2 months (30.0-44.7) for the placebo arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.49). HR adjusted for baseline covariates was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84-1.38). The most frequent drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs reported during the open-label phase were diarrhea (5.3%), fatigue (4.7%), and stomatitis (4.1%). Deaths related to pulmonary or cardiac failure were observed more frequently in the everolimus arm.

Conclusion: No significant difference in OS was observed for the everolimus plus octreotide LAR and placebo plus octreotide LAR arms of the RADIANT-2 study, even after adjusting for imbalances in the baseline covariates.

Clinical trial number: NCT00412061, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Keywords: carcinoid syndrome; everolimus; neuroendocrine tumors; overall survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. *All patients were unblinded at the time of progression or at the end of the double-blind phase, after primary analysis, and were allowed to cross over to open-label everolimus. Additional reasons for patient discontinuation in either arm of the double-blind phase included AEs, death, patient consent withdrawal, protocol violation, and loss to follow-up. **At the time of study termination, patients receiving everolimus were rolled over to study RAD001C2X01B (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01789281) or to commercial everolimus. AE, adverse event; LAR, long-acting repeatable; OS, overall survival.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary Data
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival (full analysis set).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival by baseline CgA level, irrespective of treatment arm (full analysis set). HR was obtained from unadjusted Cox's model stratified by treatment group. P value was obtained from the 2-sided log-rank test stratified by treatment group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yao J.C., Hassan M., Phan A. One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–3072. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guideline in oncology. Neuroendocrine tumors version 2. 2014; http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/neuroendocrine.pdf (3 January 2017, last date accessed).
    1. Pavel M.E., Hainsworth J.D., Baudin E. Everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours associated with carcinoid syndrome (RADIANT-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2011;378:2005–2012. - PubMed
    1. Therasse P., Arbuck S.G., Eisenhauer E.A. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment Of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216. - PubMed
    1. Broglio K.R., Berry DA. Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1642–1649. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data