Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 1;58(2):295-307.
doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilx008.

Environmental Enrichment in the 21st Century

Affiliations
Review

Environmental Enrichment in the 21st Century

Kristine Coleman et al. ILAR J. .

Abstract

More than a quarter of a century has elapsed since the Animal Welfare Act mandated that research facilities develop and follow a plan to promote the psychological well-being of captive primates. Since passage of this law, considerable effort and resources have been directed to designing environmental enrichment strategies in an effort to improve animal welfare. These plans typically consist of environmental enrichment and socialization efforts. While environmental enhancement has undergone a great deal of improvement in the past 25 years, it should be viewed as a continual work in progress, which takes advantage of emergent and future technologies. In this review, we discuss the objectives of the environmental enhancement plan along with relevant outcome measures, as well as ongoing challenges, costs, and benefits. We then review various enrichment strategies and assess their efficacy in meeting goals and objectives. Finally, we look forward to consider what the future might hold for environmental enrichment of nonhuman primates used in research.

Keywords: animal welfare; nonhuman primate; psychological well-being; social housing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Examples of toys and structures for climbing, resting, and hiding for group-housed rhesus macaques (photo courtesy of the Oregon National Primate Research Center). (B) Example of a hammock for a rhesus macaque (photo courtesy of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Caged rhesus macaque with a “porch” (photo reprinted from Gottlieb et al. 2014 [Figure 1, p 654] with permission from the Journal of the American Association of Laboratory Animal Science).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cynomolgus macaques with a tunnel connecting upper- and lower-level cages (photo courtesy of the Oregon National Primate Research Center).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rhesus macaque using iPad enrichment (photo courtesy of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker KC. 2004. Benefits of positive human interaction for socially housed chimpanzees. Anim Welf 13:239–245. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker KC. 2016. Survey of 2014 behavioral management programs for laboratory primates in the United States. Am J Primatol 78:780–796. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker KC, Bloomsmith M, Neu K, Griffis C, Maloney M, Oettinger B, Schoof VA, Martinez M. 2009. Positive reinforcement training moderates only high levels of abnormal behavior in singly housed rhesus macaques. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 12:236–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker KC, Bloomsmith M, Oettinger B, Neu K, Griffis C, Schoof VA, Maloney M. 2012. Benefits of pair housing are consistent across a diverse population of rhesus macaques. Appl Anim Behav Sci 137:148–156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker KC, Weed JL, Crockett CM, Bloomsmith MA. 2007. Survey of environmental enhancement programs for laboratory primates. Am J Primatol 69:377–394. - PubMed

Publication types