Validation of prognostic scores to predict short-term mortality in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: The CLIF-C OF is superior to MELD, CLIF SOFA, and CLIF-C ACLF
- PMID: 28445322
- PMCID: PMC5413287
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006802
Validation of prognostic scores to predict short-term mortality in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: The CLIF-C OF is superior to MELD, CLIF SOFA, and CLIF-C ACLF
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients has a high short-term mortality. Identification of effective models to predict the short-term mortality may enable early intervention and improve patients' prognosis. We aim to assess the performance of the CLIF Consortium Organ Failure score (CLIF-C OFs), CLIF sequential organ failure assessment score (CLIF-SOFAs), CLIF Consortium ACLF score (CLIF-C ACLFs), ACLF grade, and model for end-stage liver disease score (MELDs) in predicting the short-term mortality in CHB patients with ACLF.Among the 155 consecutive adult patients with liver failure as a discharge diagnosis were screened, and all the patients were treated at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (Shanghai, China) from January 2010 to February 2016. The diagnosis of ACLF was based on the criteria formalized by the ACLF consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Diagnostic accuracy for predicting short-term (28-day) mortality was calculated for CLIF-C OFs, CLIF-SOFAs, CLIF-C ACLFs, ACLF grade, and MELDs in all patients.One hundred fifty-five consecutive adult liver failure patients were screened and 85 patients including 73 males and 12 females were enrolled. Overall, the 28-day transplant-free mortality was 32% in all patients, and 100% in those with severe early course (ACLF-3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of CLIF-C OFs (AUROC: 0.906, P = .0306, compared with MELDs) was higher than those of CLIF-SOFAs (AUROC: 0.876), CLIF-C ACLFs (AUROC: 0.858), ACLF grade (AUROC: 0.857), and MELDs (AUROC: 0.838) for predicting short-term mortality. The cut-point for baseline CLIF-C OFs in predicting death was 8.5, with 67% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and AUROC of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.8450-0.9679).The results indicate that short-term mortality is high in patients with ACLF and CLIF Consortium Organ Failure score is superior to MELD, CLIF SOFA, and CLIF-C ACLF in predicting its short-term mortality.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Validation of prognostic scores to predict short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;33(4):900-909. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13991. Epub 2018 Feb 26. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 28921629
-
Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment is better than the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver criteria for defining acute-on-chronic liver failure and predicting outcome.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 28;20(40):14934-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14934. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25356054 Free PMC article.
-
[Study on the application value of MELD-Na, CLIF-C OFs, COSSH-ACLFs and NLR scoring systems in patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Dec;32(12):1496-1501. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200720-00536. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020. PMID: 33541504 Chinese.
-
Performance of scoring systems to predict mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;32(10):1668-1678. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13786. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28303605
-
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): the 'Kyoto Consensus'-steps from Asia.Hepatol Int. 2025 Feb;19(1):1-69. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10773-4. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Hepatol Int. 2025. PMID: 39961976 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29995791 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLFlactate, and CLIF-C ACLF-D Prognostic Scores in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Patients by a Single-Center ICU Experience.J Pers Med. 2021 Jan 29;11(2):79. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020079. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 33572927 Free PMC article.
-
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: The Role of Prognostic Scores in a Single-Center Experience.Med Sci Monit. 2020 May 16;26:e922121. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922121. Med Sci Monit. 2020. PMID: 32415953 Free PMC article.
-
ALTA: a simple nutritional prognostic score for patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.Front Nutr. 2024 Apr 9;11:1370025. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1370025. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38655546 Free PMC article.
-
CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C scores for the prognostication of acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A systematic review.World J Hepatol. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):2025-2043. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i12.2025. World J Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 36618331 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jalan R, Gines P, Olson JC, et al. Acute-on chronic liver failure. J Hepatol 2012;57:1336–48. - PubMed
-
- Sarin SK, Kedarisetty CK, Abbas Z, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) 2014. Hepatol Int 2014;8:453–71. - PubMed
-
- Garg H, Kumar A, Garg V, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of mortality in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Dig Liver Dis 2012;44:166–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials