Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;124(13):1928-1940.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14712. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non-doctor providers: a systematic review

Affiliations

Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non-doctor providers: a systematic review

S Sjöström et al. BJOG. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Previous systematic reviews have concluded that medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) performed by non-doctor providers may be as effective and safe as when provided by doctors. Medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage by non-doctor providers and the treated women's acceptance of non-doctor providers of TOP has not previously been reviewed.

Objectives: To review the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first-trimester medical TOP, including medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage, by trained non-doctor providers.

Search strategy and selection criteria: A search strategy using appropriate medical subject headings was developed. Electronic databases (PubMed, Popline, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception through April 2016. Randomised controlled trials and comparative observational studies were included.

Data collection and analysis: Meta-analyses were performed for included randomised controlled trials regarding the outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability to women. Certainty of evidence was established using the GRADE approach assessing study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias.

Main results: Six papers were included. Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage is probably equally effective when performed by non-doctor providers as when performed by doctors (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01). Women's acceptance, reported as overall satisfaction with the allocated provider, is probably equally high between groups (RR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01).

Conclusion: Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage provided by trained non-doctor providers is probably equally as effective and acceptable to women as when provided by doctors.

Tweetable abstract: Medical termination of pregnancy performed by doctors and non-doctors can be equally effective and acceptable.

Keywords: Incomplete abortion; medical termination of pregnancy; midlevel providers; non-doctor providers; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Meta‐analysis of effectiveness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta‐analysis of acceptability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gerdts C, Tuncalp O, Johnston H, Ganatra B. Measuring abortion‐related mortality: challenges and opportunities. Reprod Health 2015;12:87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388:258–67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Culwell KR, Hurwitz M. Addressing barriers to safe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;121(Suppl 1):S16–9. - PubMed
    1. Steinauer JLU, Filippone H, Laube D, Darney P, Jackson R. Predictors of abortion provision among practicing obstetrician‐gynecologists: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:39.e1–6. - PubMed
    1. Sjostrom S, Essen B, Gemzell‐Danielsson K, Klingberg‐Allvin M. Medical students are afraid to include abortion in their future practices: in‐depth interviews in Maharastra, India. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances