Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):196.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1940-5.

Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study

Celine Y Chhoa  1 , Alexandra Sawyer  2 , Susan Ayers  1 , Angela Pushpa-Rajah  3 , Lelia Duley  4
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study

Celine Y Chhoa et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The Cord Pilot Trial compared alternative policies for timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth at eight UK hospitals. Preterm birth can be rapid and unexpected, allowing little time for the usual consent process. Therefore, in addition to the usual procedure for written consent, a two-stage pathway for consent for use when birth was imminent was developed. The aims of this study were to explore clinicians' views and experiences of offering two consent pathways for recruitment to a randomised trial of timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth.

Methods: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Clinicians from eight hospitals in the UK who had been involved in offering consent to the Cord Pilot Trial were invited to take part in an interview. Clinicians were interviewed in person or by telephone. Interviews were analysed using inductive systematic thematic analysis.

Results: Seventeen clinicians who had either offered usual written consent only (n = 6) or both the two-stage pathway (with oral assent before the birth and written consent after the birth) and usual written consent (n = 11) were interviewed. Six themes were identified: (1) team approach to offering participation; (2) consent form as a record; (3) consent and participation as a continual process; (4) different consent pathways for different trials; (5) balance between time, information, and understanding; and (6) validity of consent. Overall, clinicians were supportive of the two-stage consent pathway. Some clinicians felt that in time-critical situations oral assent presented an advantage over the usual written consent as they provided information on a "need to know" basis. However, there was some concern about how much information should be given for oral assent, and how this is understood by women when birth is imminent.

Conclusions: The two-stage pathway for consent developed for use in the Cord Pilot Trial when birth was imminent was acceptable to clinicians for comparable low-risk studies, although some concerns were raised about the practicalities of obtaining oral assent.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN21456601 . Registered on 28 February 2013.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Consent; Ethics; Oral assent; Preterm birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child-Fetal. 2003;88(4):F280–6. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.4.F280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoehn K, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Feudtner C, Nelson RM. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child-Fetal. 2005;90(3):F267–9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.065078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mason SA, Allmark PJ. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet. 2000;356(9247):2045–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03401-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth R, Duley L, Jacoby A, Elbourne D. Women’s experiences of participating in the Magpie Trial: a postal survey in the United Kingdom. Birth. 2009;36(3):220–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00326.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilman E, Megone C, Oliver S, Duley L, Gyte G, Wright JM. The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research. Trials. 2015;16:502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources