Compensatory mechanisms activated with intermittent energy restriction: A randomized control trial
- PMID: 28446382
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.002
Compensatory mechanisms activated with intermittent energy restriction: A randomized control trial
Abstract
Background & aims: Strong compensatory responses, with reduced resting metabolic rate (RMR), increased exercise efficiency (ExEff) and appetite, are activated when weight loss (WL) is achieved with continuous energy restriction (CER), which try to restore energy balance. Intermittent energy restriction (IER), where short spells of energy restriction are interspaced by periods of habitual energy intake, may offer some protection in minimizing those responses. We aimed to compare the effect of IER versus CER on body composition and the compensatory responses induced by WL.
Methods: 35 adults (age: 39 ± 9 y) with obesity (BMI: 36 ± 4 kg/m2) were randomized to lose a similar weight with an IER (N = 18) or a CER (N = 17) diet over a 12 week period. Macronutrient composition and overall energy restriction (33% reduction) were similar between groups. Body weight/composition, RMR, fasting respiratory quotient (RQ), ExEff (10, 25, and 50 W), subjective appetite ratings (hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption (PFC)), and appetite-regulating hormones (active ghrelin (AG), cholecystokinin (CCK), total peptide YY (PYY), active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and insulin) were measured before and after WL.
Results: Changes in body weight (≈12.5% WL) and composition were similar in both groups. Fasting RQ and ExEff at 10 W increased in both groups. Losing weight, either by IER or CER dieting, did not induce significant changes in subjective appetite ratings. RMR decreased and ExEff at 25 and 50 W increased (P < 0.001 for all) in IER group only. Basal and postprandial AG increased (P < 0.05) in IER group, whereas basal active GLP-1 decreased (P = 0.033) in CER group only. Postprandial CCK decreased in both groups (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.009 for IER and CER groups, respectively). No between group differences were apparent for any of the outcomes.
Conclusions: The technique used to achieve energy restriction, whether it is continuous or intermittent, does not appear to modulate the compensatory mechanisms activated by weight loss.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT02169778 (the study was registered in clinicaltrial.gov).
Keywords: Appetite; Body composition; Continuous energy restriction; Energy expenditure; Intermittent energy restriction; Weight loss.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The impact of rate of weight loss on body composition and compensatory mechanisms during weight reduction: A randomized control trial.Clin Nutr. 2018 Aug;37(4):1154-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 25. Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28479016 Clinical Trial.
-
Matched Weight Loss Through Intermittent or Continuous Energy Restriction Does Not Lead To Compensatory Increases in Appetite and Eating Behavior in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Women with Overweight and Obesity.J Nutr. 2020 Mar 1;150(3):623-633. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz296. J Nutr. 2020. PMID: 31825067 Clinical Trial.
-
Intermittent v. continuous energy restriction: differential effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight loss in overweight/obese participants.Br J Nutr. 2018 Mar;119(5):507-516. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003890. Br J Nutr. 2018. PMID: 29508693
-
Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.Adv Nutr. 2024 Jan;15(1):100130. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Adv Nutr. 2024. PMID: 37827491 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale for novel intermittent dieting strategies to attenuate adaptive responses to energy restriction.Obes Rev. 2018 Dec;19 Suppl 1:47-60. doi: 10.1111/obr.12787. Obes Rev. 2018. PMID: 30511512 Review.
Cited by
-
Revisiting the Compensatory Theory as an explanatory model for relapse in obesity management.Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov 11;112(5):1170-1179. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa243. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32936896 Free PMC article.
-
Is Intermittent Fasting Better Than Continuous Energy Restriction for Adults with Overweight and Obesity?Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Sep 15;15:2813-2826. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S376409. eCollection 2022. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022. PMID: 36134390 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Epidemic Intermittent Fasting on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 18;8:669325. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.669325. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34733872 Free PMC article.
-
Intermittent Energy Restriction for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review of Cardiometabolic, Inflammatory and Appetite Outcomes.Biol Res Nurs. 2022 Jul;24(3):410-428. doi: 10.1177/10998004221078079. Epub 2022 May 8. Biol Res Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35531785 Free PMC article.
-
Intermittent and continuous energy restriction result in similar weight loss, weight loss maintenance, and body composition changes in a 6 month randomized pilot study.Clin Obes. 2021 Apr;11(2):e12430. doi: 10.1111/cob.12430. Epub 2020 Dec 10. Clin Obes. 2021. PMID: 33305526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous