Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 26;7(1):1204.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01107-6.

Delivering Prolonged Intensive Care to a Non-human Primate: A High Fidelity Animal Model of Critical Illness

Affiliations

Delivering Prolonged Intensive Care to a Non-human Primate: A High Fidelity Animal Model of Critical Illness

P Guillaume Poliquin et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Critical care needs have been rising in recent decades as populations age and comorbidities increase. Sepsis-related admissions to critical care contribute up to 50% of volume and septic shock carries a 35-54% fatality rate. Improvements in sepsis-related care and mortality would have a significant impact of a resource-intensive area of health care delivery. Unfortunately, research has been hampered by the lack of an animal model that replicates the complex care provided to humans in an intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a protocol to provide full ICU type supportive care to Rhesus macaques. This included mechanical ventilation, continuous sedation, fluid and electrolyte management and vasopressor support in response to Ebolavirus-induced septic shock. The animals accurately recapitulated human responses to a full range of ICU interventions (e.g. fluid resuscitation). This model can overcome current animal model limitations by accurately emulating the complexity of ICU care and thereby provide a platform for testing new interventions in critical care and sepsis without placing patients at risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:65–71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b090d0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tiru B, et al. The Economic and Humanistic Burden of Severe Sepsis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:925–937. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0282-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent J-L, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study*. Critical Care Medicine. 2006;34:344–353. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lakshmikanth CL, Jacob SP, Chaithra VH, de Castro-Faria-Neto HC, Marathe GK. Sepsis: in search of cure. Inflamm Res. 2016;65:587–602. doi: 10.1007/s00011-016-0937-y. - DOI - PubMed