Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 12:8:557.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557. eCollection 2017.

The Stroop Color and Word Test

Affiliations
Review

The Stroop Color and Word Test

Federica Scarpina et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect. The aim of the present work is to verify the theoretical adequacy of the various scoring methods used to measure the Stroop effect. We present a systematic review of studies that have provided normative data for the SCWT. We referred to both electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) and citations. Our findings show that while several scoring methods have been reported in literature, none of the reviewed methods enables us to fully assess the Stroop effect. Furthermore, we discuss several normative scoring methods from the Italian panorama as reported in literature. We claim for an alternative scoring method which takes into consideration both speed and accuracy of the response. Finally, we underline the importance of assessing the performance in all Stroop Test conditions (word reading, color naming, named color-word).

Keywords: executive functions; inhibition; neuropsychological assessment; stroop color and word test; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies selection process.

References

    1. Al-Ghatani A. M., Obonsawin M. C., Binshaig B. A., Al-Moutaery K. R. (2011). Saudi normative data for the Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Stroop test, test of non-verbal intelligence-3, picture completion and vocabulary (subtest of the wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised). Neurosciences 16, 29–41. - PubMed
    1. Amato M. P., Portaccio E., Goretti B., Zipoli V., Ricchiuti L., De Caro M. F., et al. (2006). The Rao's brief repeatable battery and stroop test: normative values with age, education and gender corrections in an Italian population. Mult. Scler. 12, 787–793. 10.1177/1352458506070933 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews K., Shuttleworth-Edwards A., Radloff S. (2012). Normative indications for Xhosa speaking unskilled workers on the Trail Making and Stroop Tests. J. Psychol. Afr. 22, 333–341. 10.1080/14330237.2012.10820538 - DOI
    1. Artiola L., Fortuny L. A. I. (1999). Manual de Normas Y Procedimientos Para la Bateria Neuropsicolog. Tucson, AZ: Taylor & Francis.
    1. Barbarotto R., Laiacona M., Frosio R., Vecchio M., Farinato A., Capitani E. (1998). A normative study on visual reaction times and two Stroop colour-word tests. Neurol. Sci. 19, 161–170. 10.1007/BF00831566 - DOI - PubMed