Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 7:7:66.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00066. eCollection 2017.

Following the Preclinical Data: Leveraging the Abscopal Effect More Efficaciously

Affiliations

Following the Preclinical Data: Leveraging the Abscopal Effect More Efficaciously

Wilfred Ngwa et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy is employed in the treatment of over 50% of cancer patients. However, this therapy approach is limited to mainly treating localized disease. In 1953, Mole described the remarkable abscopal effect, whereby, localized radiotherapy of a patient's primary tumor might engender regression of cancer at distant sites, which were not irradiated. Current consensus is that if the abscopal effect can be efficaciously leveraged, it would transform the field of radiation oncology, extending the use of radiotherapy to treatment of both localized and metastatic disease. A close examination of the literature on the abscopal effect proffers a disruptive new hypothesis for consideration in future clinical trials. This hypothesis is that generating a subcutaneous human tumor autograft as the primary tumor may be a more efficacious approach to prime the abscopal effect. Following the preclinical data, the merits and demerits of such an approach are examined in this article.

Keywords: abscopal effect; immunoadjuvants; immunoregulation; metastasis; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of potential modus operandi for combining radiotherapy with immunoadjuvants to prime the abscopal effect more efficaciously.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of ongoing clinical trials on combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy per disease site (summarized from the Table 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of (A) patient with local and metastatic tumor; (B) subcutaneous autograft generated; (C) treatment of subcutaneous tumor with radiotherapy and immunoadjuvant; (D) regression of autograft, primary tumor, and metastasis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mole R. Whole body irradiation—radiobiology or medicine? Br J Radiol (1953) 26(305):234–41.10.1259/0007-1285-26-305-234 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golden EB, Demaria S, Schiff PB, Chachoua A, Formenti SC. An abscopal response to radiation and ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res (2013) 1(6):365–72.10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demaria S, Ng B, Devitt ML, Babb JS, Kawashima N, Liebes L, et al. Ionizing radiation inhibition of distant untreated tumors (abscopal effect) is immune mediated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2004) 58(3):862–70.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Radiotherapy to convert the tumor into an in situ vaccine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 84(4):879–80.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quarmby S, Hunter RD, Kumar S. Irradiation induced expression of CD31, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in human microvascular endothelial cells. Anticancer Res (1999) 20(5B):3375–81. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources