Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep/Oct;41(5):792-797.
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000597.

Left Atrium Measurements via Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram as a Predictor of Diastolic Dysfunction

Affiliations

Left Atrium Measurements via Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram as a Predictor of Diastolic Dysfunction

Adam N Lick et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Sep/Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Left atrium (LA) enlargement on echocardiography may be an indicator of diastolic dysfunction (DD). It is not well known if computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) can detect DD.

Methods: A total of 127 patients who underwent both CTPA and echo within 48 hours were analyzed retrospectively. Left atrium diameters from CTPA were correlated with echo and evaluated against degrees of DD. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography pulmonary artery (PA)/aorta ratio was analyzed as a tool to detect pulmonary hypertension.

Results: There were 42% of patients who had DD. There was a strong correlation between LA size on CTPA and echo (r = 0.78). An LA greater than 4.0 cm gave a sensitivity of 68.1% and specificity of 73.9% for DD detection. A PA/aorta cutoff greater than 0.84 yielded a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 33% for pulmonary hypertension.

Conclusions: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography measurements of LA and PA/aorta ratio correlate strongly with equivalent findings on echo. We suggest that LA and PA/aorta measurements be included on chest CTPA reports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
200 charts were originally selected for study based on inclusion criteria. 13 were eliminated as they were just outside of the 48-hour restriction, 45 had incomplete CTPA data. 15 of the remaining 142 charts were not included as they lacked LA measurements in their echo reports, leaving a total of 127 charts in the final analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Left atrium and pulmonary artery measurements using CTPA
Panel A: CTPA left atrial measurement using the maximum anterior-posterior diameter of the midline in its middle 50%; Panel B: CTPA pulmonary artery measurement using the widest diameter perpendicular to the long axis at the pulmonary artery bifurcation. Ascending aorta measurement was taken at the same level.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Left atrial sizes measured using CTPA correlated strongly with left atrial sizes measured with echo
Panel A: Left atrial sizes from CTPA were correlated against left atrial sizes gleaned from echo reports. There was a strong correlation between left atrial sizes using both methods, (r=0.78, n=127, 95% CI 0.70–0.84); Panel B: Further analysis with a Bland-Altman plot revealed a minimal average discrepancy between both modalities (n=127, bias=0.07, 95% limit of agreement= −0.56 to 0.71).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Left atrial sizes measured on CTPA are significantly larger in patients with moderate or severe diastolic dysfunction
Panel A: LA sizes measured on CTPA were analyzed against diastolic dysfunction grades gleaned from echo reports; Panel B: Receiver operating curve of CTPA LA size and diastolic dysfunction on echo; Panel C: LA sizes measured on CTPA were correlated with estimation of filling pressures using E/E’ from echo reports.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CTPA pulmonary artery to aorta ratios were significantly larger in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressures determined by echo
Pulmonary artery size was measured on CTPA and standardized using the ascending aorta measurement for each patient. An estimated systolic pressure of >35 mmHg on echo was defined as elevated. There was a significant difference in the CTPA determined PA/Aorta ratio for patients with normal pressures, 0.89 (n=38, 95% CI 0.93–1.04), and those with elevated pressures, 0.98 (n=49, 95% CI 0.86–0.93).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zile MR, Baicu CF, Bonnema DD. Diastolic heart failure: definitions and terminology. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2005;47:307–313. - PubMed
    1. Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, et al. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA. 2011;306:856–863. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Redfield MM, et al. A contemporary appraisal of the heart failure epidemic in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:996–1004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liao L, Jollis JG, Anstrom KJ, et al. Costs for heart failure with normal vs reduced ejection fraction. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:112–118. - PubMed
    1. Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, Takeshita A. Mortality and readmission of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and preserved versus depressed systolic function. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:530–533. - PubMed