Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research
- PMID: 28449191
- PMCID: PMC5593776
- DOI: 10.1111/add.13854
Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate how young adults perceive and compare harms and benefits of marijuana and tobacco products in the context of a legal marijuana market in Colorado.
Design: Semi-structured qualitative interviews.
Setting: Denver, CO, USA.
Participants: Thirty-two young adults (aged 18-26 years) who used tobacco/marijuana/vaporizers.
Measurements: Semi-structured interviews addressed perceived harms and benefits of various tobacco and marijuana products and personal experiences with these products.
Findings: Young adults evaluated harms and benefits using five dimensions: (1) combustion-smoking was considered more harmful than non-combustible products (e.g. e-cigarettes, vaporizers and edibles); (2) potency-edibles and marijuana concentrates were perceived as more harmful than smoking marijuana flower because of potential to receive too large a dose of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); (3) chemicals-products containing chemical additives were seen as more harmful than 'pure' or 'natural' plant products; (4) addiction-participants recognized physiological addiction to nicotine, but talked primarily about psychological or life-style dependence on marijuana; and (5) source of knowledge-personal experiences, warning labels, campaigns, the media and opinions of product retailers and medical practitioners affected perceptions of harms and benefits.
Conclusions: Among young adults in Colorado, USA, perceived harms and benefits of tobacco and marijuana include multiple dimensions. Health educational campaigns could benefit from addressing these dimensions, such as the potency of nicotine and cannabis concentrates and harmful chemicals present in the organic material of tobacco and marijuana. Descriptors such as 'natural' and 'pure' in the promotion or packaging of tobacco and marijuana products might be misleading.
Keywords: Cannabis; electronic cigarettes; perceived benefits; perceived harm; qualitative research; tobacco.
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest: None
Comment in
-
Commentary on Popova et al. (2017): Co-used and co-administered tobacco and cannabis (marijuana) require further investigation.Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1830-1831. doi: 10.1111/add.13972. Addiction. 2017. PMID: 28891146 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Traversing the triangulum: the intersection of tobacco, legalised marijuana and electronic vaporisers in Denver, Colorado.Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i96-i102. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053091. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 27697954 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win.Subst Use Misuse. 2015 Jan;50(1):79-89. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.958857. Epub 2014 Sep 30. Subst Use Misuse. 2015. PMID: 25268294 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of marijuana-vaporizer users.Subst Abus. 2014;35(2):127-8. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.823902. Subst Abus. 2014. PMID: 24821347
-
How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes.Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e49-e58. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053060. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Tob Control. 2017. PMID: 27625408 Review.
-
Cannabis Legalization and Acute Harm From High Potency Cannabis Products: A Narrative Review and Recommendations for Public Health.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 23;11:591979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.591979. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 33173527 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e026306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026306. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30948599 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for individual and concurrent use of vaped nicotine and cannabis: their similarities, differences, and association with product use.J Cannabis Res. 2021 Aug 27;3(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00097-7. J Cannabis Res. 2021. PMID: 34452640 Free PMC article.
-
Cannabis Use and Its Impact on Mental Health in Youth in Australia and the United States: A Scoping Review.Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;5(1):106-121. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5010007. Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38534804 Free PMC article.
-
"I think we can do without [tobacco]": support for policies to end the tobacco epidemic among California adolescents.Tob Control. 2023 Dec 26:tc-2023-058288. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058288. Online ahead of print. Tob Control. 2023. PMID: 38148144 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a Mock Retail Cannabis Shop for Research: A Description of The CANNEX.Cannabis. 2025 Jul 15;8(2):51-66. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2025/000297. eCollection 2025. Cannabis. 2025. PMID: 40909148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schauer GL, King BA, Bunnell RE, Promoff G, McAfee TA. Toking, vaping, and eating for health or fun: Marijuana use patterns in adults, US, 2014. American journal of preventive medicine. 2016;50(1):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Smith J. Marijuana legislation coming to Canada next spring. 2016 Apr 20; https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/04/20/marijuana-legislation-com....
-
- Hall W, Weier M. Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2015;97(6):607–15. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical