Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research
- PMID: 28449191
- PMCID: PMC5593776
- DOI: 10.1111/add.13854
Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate how young adults perceive and compare harms and benefits of marijuana and tobacco products in the context of a legal marijuana market in Colorado.
Design: Semi-structured qualitative interviews.
Setting: Denver, CO, USA.
Participants: Thirty-two young adults (aged 18-26 years) who used tobacco/marijuana/vaporizers.
Measurements: Semi-structured interviews addressed perceived harms and benefits of various tobacco and marijuana products and personal experiences with these products.
Findings: Young adults evaluated harms and benefits using five dimensions: (1) combustion-smoking was considered more harmful than non-combustible products (e.g. e-cigarettes, vaporizers and edibles); (2) potency-edibles and marijuana concentrates were perceived as more harmful than smoking marijuana flower because of potential to receive too large a dose of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); (3) chemicals-products containing chemical additives were seen as more harmful than 'pure' or 'natural' plant products; (4) addiction-participants recognized physiological addiction to nicotine, but talked primarily about psychological or life-style dependence on marijuana; and (5) source of knowledge-personal experiences, warning labels, campaigns, the media and opinions of product retailers and medical practitioners affected perceptions of harms and benefits.
Conclusions: Among young adults in Colorado, USA, perceived harms and benefits of tobacco and marijuana include multiple dimensions. Health educational campaigns could benefit from addressing these dimensions, such as the potency of nicotine and cannabis concentrates and harmful chemicals present in the organic material of tobacco and marijuana. Descriptors such as 'natural' and 'pure' in the promotion or packaging of tobacco and marijuana products might be misleading.
Keywords: Cannabis; electronic cigarettes; perceived benefits; perceived harm; qualitative research; tobacco.
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest: None
Comment in
-
Commentary on Popova et al. (2017): Co-used and co-administered tobacco and cannabis (marijuana) require further investigation.Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1830-1831. doi: 10.1111/add.13972. Addiction. 2017. PMID: 28891146 No abstract available.
References
-
- Schauer GL, King BA, Bunnell RE, Promoff G, McAfee TA. Toking, vaping, and eating for health or fun: Marijuana use patterns in adults, US, 2014. American journal of preventive medicine. 2016;50(1):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Smith J. Marijuana legislation coming to Canada next spring. 2016 Apr 20; https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/04/20/marijuana-legislation-com....
-
- Hall W, Weier M. Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2015;97(6):607–15. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical