Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Mar;9(3):E274-E276.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.42.

A greater quality of clinical evidence is needed

Affiliations
Editorial

A greater quality of clinical evidence is needed

Marcelo F Jiménez et al. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on

References

    1. Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, et al. Single- versus multiple-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a propensity-matched study†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49 Suppl 1:i48-53. - PubMed
    1. Vannucci F, Gonzalez-Rivas D. Is VATS lobectomy standard of care for operable non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer 2016;100:114-9. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiménez López M, Novoa Valentín NM. Implementing a VATS Lobectomy Program in Spain. The Wet Lab, a Necessary Tool. Arch Bronconeumol 2016;52:579-80. 10.1016/j.arbr.2016.04.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, et al. Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg 2015;261:793-9. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000712 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu CC, Shih CS, Pennarun N, et al. Transition from a multiport technique to a single-port technique for lung cancer surgery: is lymph node dissection inferior using the single-port technique?†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49 Suppl 1:i64-72. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources