Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;6(5):297-305.
doi: 10.1530/EC-17-0067. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Comparative pharmacology of a new recombinant FSH expressed by a human cell line

Affiliations

Comparative pharmacology of a new recombinant FSH expressed by a human cell line

Wolfgang Koechling et al. Endocr Connect. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Recombinant FSH proteins are important therapeutic agents for the treatment of infertility, including follitropin alfa expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells and, more recently, follitropin delta expressed in the human cell line PER.C6. These recombinant FSH proteins have distinct glycosylation, and have distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in women. Comparative experiments demonstrated that follitropin delta and follitropin alfa displayed the same in vitro potency at the human FSH receptor, but varied in their pharmacokinetics in mouse and rat. While follitropin delta clearance from serum depended in part on the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), follitropin alfa clearance was unaffected by ASGPR inhibition in rat or genetic ablation in mice. The distinct properties of follitropin delta and follitropin alfa are likely to contribute to the differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles observed in women and to influence their efficacy in therapeutic protocols for the treatment of infertility.

Keywords: FSH glycosylation; follicle-stimulating hormone; follitropin delta; gonadotropin clearance; recombinant FSH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The displacement of radiolabeled propionyl-3H FSH from human FSH receptor was measured as a reduction in dpm bound across the indicated concentrations of follitropin delta (open circles, blue) and follitropin alfa (open squares, red), or total binding in the absence of unlabeled recombinant FSH protein (open triangle, black). Each concentration was tested in duplicate, with the mean and s.d. indicated. Data were fit using four-parameter curve-fitting. The results for one experiment are shown, whereas results from two other tests producing similar results are not shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Production of cAMP in response to activation of the human FSH receptor in stably transfected HEK-293 cells was measured across the indicated concentrations of follitropin delta (open circles, blue), follitropin alfa (open squares, red) or no recombinant FSH (open triangles, black) with increasing luminescence (RLU) proportional to increasing cAMP present. Each concentration of rFSH proteins was tested in quadruplicate, with the mean and s.d. shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The induction of hormone release and increase in gene expression were measured in human granulosa cells exposed to rFSH proteins in vitro. Cells from eight patients were included, with duplicate samples of cells from each patient tested at each rFSH concentration, normalizing responses relative to the level observed in the absence of rFSH (100%), with data points reflecting the mean and s.e.m. The response for follitropin delta (open circles, blue) and follitropin alfa (open squares, red) is shown in terms of progesterone secretion (A), inhibin A secretion (B) and 3beta-HSD gene expression (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The bioactivity of follitropin delta (blue bars) and follitropin alfa (red bars) was compared in vivo in rat in the Steelman–Pohley bioassay, measuring the increase in ovarian weight with the administration of the indicated total dose of rFSH proteins. Bars are the mean of 14 animals in each dose group, and error bars are the s.d.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The clearance of follitropin delta (blue circles) and follitropin alfa (red squares) was compared following intravenous injection in rat, in the presence of a saturating dose of ASF (filled symbols), or the absence of co-injected ASF (open symbols). Serum taken at the indicated time points was analyzed for rFSH concentration. A Student’s t-test compared results in the presence or absence of ASF, with an asterisk (*) indicating a significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The clearance of follitropin delta (blue circles) and follitropin alfa (red squares) was compared in wild-type mice (open symbols) and Asgpr knockout mice (filled symbols), determining rFSH concentration present in serum at varying time points. A Student’s t-test compared results in the presence or absence of ASF, with an asterisk (*) indicating a significant difference (P < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howles CM. Role of LH and FSH in ovarian function. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 2000. 161 25–30. (10.1016/S0303-7207(99)00219-1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocrine Reviews 2006. 27 170–207. (10.1210/er.2005-0015) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarlatzis BC, Fauser BC, Kolibianakis EM, Diedrich K, Rombauts L, Devroey P. GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF. Human Reproduction Update 2006. 12 333–340. (10.1093/humupd/dml001) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howles CM. Genetic engineering of human FSH (Gonal-F). Human Reproduction Update 1996. 2 172–191. (10.1093/humupd/2.2.172) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goa KL, Wagstaff AJ. Follitropin alpha in infertility: a review. BioDrugs 1998. 9 235–260. (10.2165/00063030-199809030-00006) - DOI - PubMed