Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Summer;16(2):mr2.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352.

A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses

Cissy J Ballen  1 , Jessamina E Blum  2 , Sara Brownell  3 , Sadie Hebert  2 , James Hewlett  4 , Joanna R Klein  5 , Erik A McDonald  6 , Denise L Monti  7 , Stephen C Nold  8 , Krista E Slemmons  9 , Paula A G Soneral  10 , Sehoya Cotner  2
Affiliations

A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses

Cissy J Ballen et al. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer.

Erratum in

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non-science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Differences and similarities among inquiry-based labs present students a range of opportunities for engaging in the process of science.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alkaher I., Dolan E. L. Integrating research into undergraduate courses: current practices and future directions. In: Sunal D., Sunal C., Zollman D., Mason C., Wright E., editors. Research in science education: Research based undergraduate science teaching. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2014. pp. (pp. 403–434).
    1. Allum N., Sturgis P., Tabourazi D., Brunton-Smith I. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17(1):35–54.
    1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: 2011.
    1. Auchincloss L. C., Laursen S. L., Branchaw J. L., Eagan K., Graham M., Hanauer D. I., Rowland S. Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2014;13(1):29–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bangera G., Brownell S. E. Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2014;13(4):602–606. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources