Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?
- PMID: 28450975
- PMCID: PMC5405449
- DOI: 10.5709/acp-0209-2
Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?
Abstract
Human information processing is limited by attentional resources. That is, via attentional mechanisms, humans select a limited amount of sensory input to process while other sensory input is neglected. In multisensory research, a matter of ongoing debate is whether there are distinct pools of attentional resources for each sensory modality or whether attentional resources are shared across sensory modalities. Recent studies have suggested that attentional resource allocation across sensory modalities is in part task-dependent. That is, the recruitment of attentional resources across the sensory modalities depends on whether processing involves object-based attention (e.g., the discrimination of stimulus attributes) or spatial attention (e.g., the localization of stimuli). In the present paper, we review findings in multisensory research related to this view. For the visual and auditory sensory modalities, findings suggest that distinct resources are recruited when humans perform object-based attention tasks, whereas for the visual and tactile sensory modalities, partially shared resources are recruited. If object-based attention tasks are time-critical, shared resources are recruited across the sensory modalities. When humans perform an object-based attention task in combination with a spatial attention task, partly shared resources are recruited across the sensory modalities as well. Conversely, for spatial attention tasks, attentional processing does consistently involve shared attentional resources for the sensory modalities. Generally, findings suggest that the attentional system flexibly allocates attentional resources depending on task demands. We propose that such flexibility reflects a large-scale optimization strategy that minimizes the brain's costly resource expenditures and simultaneously maximizes capability to process currently relevant information.
Keywords: attentional blink; attentional resources; load theory; multiple object tracking; multisensory.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources.Front Integr Neurosci. 2016 Mar 8;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2016.00013. eCollection 2016. Front Integr Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27013994 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.Iperception. 2017 Jan 1;8(1):2041669516688026. doi: 10.1177/2041669516688026. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb. Iperception. 2017. PMID: 28203353 Free PMC article.
-
Shared or Distinct Attentional Resources? Confounds in Dual Task Designs, Countermeasures, and Guidelines.Multisens Res. 2019 Jan 1;32(2):145-163. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20181328. Multisens Res. 2019. PMID: 31059470 Review.
-
Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.Multisens Res. 2015;28(3-4):371-92. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002482. Multisens Res. 2015. PMID: 26288905
-
Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review.Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 27;8:1896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01896. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29163278 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
EEG β oscillations in aberrant data perception under cognitive load modulation.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):22995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74381-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39362975 Free PMC article.
-
Labor division in collaborative visual search: a review.Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1323-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01767-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Psychol Res. 2023. PMID: 36378344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Relationship between Types of Attention and Auditory Processing Skills: Reconsidering Auditory Processing Disorder Diagnosis.Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 30;9:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00034. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29441033 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource-sharing accounts.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00267-w. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021. PMID: 33398471 Free PMC article.
-
The role of spatial information in an approximate cross-modal number matching task.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1253-1266. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02658-9. Epub 2023 Jan 31. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 36720781 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alnæs D., Sneve M. H., Espeseth T., Endestad T., van de Pavert S. H. P., Laeng B. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. Journal of Vision. 2014;14:1–20. - PubMed
-
- Alvarez G. A., Cavanagh P. Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science. 2005;16:637–643. - PubMed
-
- Alvarez G. A., Franconeri S. L. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision. 2007;7:1–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources