Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;5(1):14-25.
doi: 10.1177/2167702616633158. Epub 2016 May 20.

Blunted reward processing in remitted melancholic depression

Affiliations

Blunted reward processing in remitted melancholic depression

Anna Weinberg et al. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Blunted reward response appears to be a trait-like marker of vulnerability for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). As such, it should be present in remitted individuals; however, depression is a heterogeneous syndrome. Reward-related impairments may be more pronounced in individuals with melancholic depression. The present study examined neural responses to rewards in remitted melancholic depression (rMD; N = 29), remitted non-melancholic depression (rNMD; N = 56), and healthy controls (HC; N = 81). Event-related potentials to monetary gain and loss were recorded during a simple gambling paradigm. rMD was characterized by a blunted response to rewards relative to both the HC and the rNMD groups, who did not differ from one another. Moreover, the rMD and rNMD groups did not differ in course or severity of their past illnesses, or current depressive symptoms or functioning. Results suggest that blunted response to rewards may be a viable vulnerability marker for melancholic depression.

Keywords: depression; melancholia; reward processing; vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stimulus-locked ERP waveforms at an average of electrode sites Cz and FCz for Healthy Controls (HC), remitted Non-Melancholic Depressed (rNMD), and Melancholic Depressed (rMD) groups. For each panel, stimulus onset occurred at 0 ms. Per ERP convention, negative voltages are plotted up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scalp topographies representing the RewP. These maps are derived from the average difference between conditions (non-reward minus reward response) from 220 to 360 ms and represent the Δ RewP for Healthy Controls (HC), Non-Melancholic Depressed (rNMD), and Melancholic Depressed (rMD) groups.

References

    1. Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Ajdacic V, Rössler W. Melancholia and atypical depression in the Zurich study: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, course, comorbidity and personality. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2007;115:72–84. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister H, Parker G. Meta-review of depressive subtyping models. Journal of affective disorders. 2012;139:126–140. - PubMed
    1. Becker MP, Nitsch AM, Miltner WH, Straube T. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:3005–3012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bench C, Frackowiak R, Dolan R. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow on recovery from depression. Psychological medicine. 1995;25:247–261. - PubMed
    1. Berridge KC. The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191:391–431. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources