Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 28;12(4):e0176649.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176649. eCollection 2017.

Pre- and posttreatment with hydrogen sulfide prevents ventilator-induced lung injury by limiting inflammation and oxidation

Affiliations

Pre- and posttreatment with hydrogen sulfide prevents ventilator-induced lung injury by limiting inflammation and oxidation

Simone Faller et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Although essential in critical care medicine, mechanical ventilation often results in ventilator-induced lung injury. Low concentrations of hydrogen sulfide have been proven to have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects in the lung. The aim of this study was to analyze the kinetic effects of pre- and posttreatment with hydrogen sulfide in order to prevent lung injury as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress upon mechanical ventilation. Mice were either non-ventilated or mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of 12 ml/kg for 6 h. Pretreated mice inhaled hydrogen sulfide in low dose for 1, 3, or 5 h prior to mechanical ventilation. Posttreated mice were ventilated with air followed by ventilation with hydrogen sulfide in various combinations. In addition, mice were ventilated with air for 10 h, or with air for 5 h and subsequently with hydrogen sulfide for 5 h. Histology, interleukin-1β, neutrophil counts, and reactive oxygen species formation were examined in the lungs. Both pre-and posttreatment with hydrogen sulfide time-dependently reduced or even prevented edema formation, gross histological damage, neutrophil influx and reactive oxygen species production in the lung. These results were also observed in posttreatment, when the experimental time was extended and hydrogen sulfide administration started as late as after 5 h air ventilation. In conclusion, hydrogen sulfide exerts lung protection even when its application is limited to a short or delayed period. The observed lung protection is mediated by inhibition of inflammatory and oxidative signaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study design and timeline.
(A) Pretreatment. Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) for 6 h or were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h with either air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice spontaneously breathed air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S for 1, 3, or 5 h prior to mechanical ventilation with air for another 6 h as indicated. (B) Posttreatment. Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) for 6 h or were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h with either air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice were first mechanically ventilated with air alone for 5, 3, or 1 h, followed by ventilation with 80 ppm H2S for another 1, 3, or 5 h as indicated. (C) Expanded Posttreatment. Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) for 6 h or were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg with either air in the absence or presence of 80 ppm H2S (6 h air, 6 h H2S) or were ventilated for 10 h with air alone (10 h air) or for 5 h with air alone followed by ventilation with H2S for another 5 h (5 h air + 5 h H2S).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effect of H2S pretreatment on ventilator-induced lung injury.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h either with air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice spontaneously breathed air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S 1, 3, or 5 h prior to mechanical ventilation with air for another 6 h as indicated. Lung sections were stained with H&E. Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated (A). Alveolar wall thickness was measured (B) and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) score was calculated (C). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 7/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group; &P<0.05 vs. 1h H2S pre + 6h air vent group.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effect of H2S pretreatment on lung inflammation and oxidative stress.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h either with air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice spontaneously breathed air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S 1, 3, or 5 h prior to mechanical ventilation with air for another 6 h as indicated. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) IL-1β cytokine content was determined by ELISA (A). The fraction of neutrophil cells was measured in BAL fluid by cytospin analysis (B). Lung tissue sections were stained with dihydroethidium (C). Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated in C. ROS fluorescence intensity was measured, calculated, and expressed as fold induction compared to control group (D). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 6/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effect of H2S posttreatment on ventilator-induced lung injury.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h either with air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice were first mechanically ventilated with air alone for 5, 3, or 1 h, followed by ventilation with 80 ppm H2S for another 1, 3, or 5 h as indicated. Lung sections were stained with H&E. Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated (A). Alveolar wall thickness was measured (B) and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) score was calculated (C). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 7/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group; &P<0.05 vs. 5h air vent + 1h H2S vent group; +P<0.05 vs. 3h air vent + 3h H2S vent group; °P<0.05 vs. 1h air vent + 5h H2S vent group.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Effect of H2S posttreatment on lung inflammation and oxidative stress.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg for 6 h either with air alone (6 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). All other mice were first mechanically ventilated with air alone for 5, 3, or 1 h, followed by ventilation with 80 ppm H2S for another 1, 3, or 5 h as indicated. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) IL-1β cytokine content was determined by ELISA (A). The fraction of neutrophil cells was measured in BAL fluid by cytospin analysis (B). Lung tissue sections were stained with dihydroethidium (C). Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated in C. ROS fluorescence intensity was measured, calculated, and expressed as fold induction compared to control group (D). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 7/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group; &P<0.05 vs. 5h air vent + 1h H2S vent group; +P<0.05 vs. 3h air vent + 3h H2S vent group.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Effect of expanded H2S posttreatment on ventilator-induced lung damage.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg either with air alone (6 h air, 10 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). Another group of mice was first mechanically ventilated with air alone for 5 h, followed by ventilation with 80 ppm H2S for another 5 h. Lung sections were stained with H&E. Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated (A). Alveolar wall thickness was measured (B) and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) score was calculated (C). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 6/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group; &P<0.05 vs. 10h air vent group.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Effect of expanded H2S posttreatment on lung inflammation and oxidative stress.
Mice spontaneously breathed air (control) or for 6 h, or they were mechanically ventilated with 12 ml/kg either with air alone (6 h air, 10 h air) or air supplemented with 80 ppm H2S (6 h H2S). Another group of mice was first mechanically ventilated with air alone for 5 h, followed by ventilation with 80 ppm H2S for another 5 h. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) IL-1β cytokine content was determined by ELISA (A). The fraction of neutrophil cells was measured in BAL fluid by cytospin analysis (B). Lung tissue sections were stained with dihydroethidium (C). Representative pictures are shown for each experimental group as indicated in C. ROS fluorescence intensity was measured, calculated, and expressed as fold induction compared to control group (D). Data represent means ± SEM for n = 6/group. ANOVA (Tukey`s post hoc test), *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. 6h air vent group; &P<0.05 vs. 10h air vent group; +P<0.05 vs. 5h air vent + 5h H2S vent group.

References

    1. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1301–1308. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belperio JA, Keane MP, Lynch JP III, Strieter RM The role of cytokines during the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated and ventilator-induced lung injury. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 27: 350–364. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-948289 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neto AS, Simonis FD, Barbas CS, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, et al. Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 2155–2163. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001189 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serpa NA, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Biehl M, Binnekade JM, et al. Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015; 123: 66–78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000706 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lionetti V, Recchia FA, Ranieri VM Overview of ventilator-induced lung injury mechanisms. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11: 82–86. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources