Prevalence and Predictors of Diastolic Dysfunction According to Different Classification Criteria: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young in Adults Study
- PMID: 28453616
- PMCID: PMC5860331
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww214
Prevalence and Predictors of Diastolic Dysfunction According to Different Classification Criteria: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young in Adults Study
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is often preceded by diastolic dysfunction (DD). Of several published DD criteria, it is unclear which, if any, are applicable to data obtained in epidemiologic cohorts. We evaluated the prevalence of DD using previously published definitions in a population-based study, the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study, using data gathered in 2010-2011. Echocardiography was performed on 3,474 individuals (mean age = 50.2 years) at the CARDIA year 25 examination. Four published definitions of DD were studied. We calculated DD prevalence for each definition and determined the overlap between definitions. We used logistic regression to assess the strength of associations between demographic and clinical factors and the definitions of DD. Prevalence of DD ranged from 2% to 32% across the 4 definitions, with a minority of cases identified by more than 1 definition. Two definitions classified 38%-39% of the study sample as indeterminate for DD. Associations of risk factors with DD varied considerably, with male sex being associated positively with DD for one definition (odds ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.6) and inversely for another (odds ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval: 0.6, 0.8). Prevalence of DD varies markedly in CARDIA by the definition applied. A uniform, reliable, and accurate definition of DD for epidemiologic studies is needed.
Keywords: diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; epidemiologic methods; heart failure.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Comment in
-
Invited Commentary: Searching for the Perfect Measure of Diastolic Dysfunction-A Futile Exercise?Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 15;185(12):1228-1230. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww215. Am J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28453609
-
Rasmussen-Torvik et al. Respond to "The Perfect Measure of Diastolic Dysfunction".Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 15;185(12):1231-1232. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww216. Am J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28453663 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ammar KA, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, et al. . Prevalence and prognostic significance of heart failure stages: application of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association heart failure staging criteria in the community. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1563–1570. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources