Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 28;7(1):1281.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01253-x.

Cation and voltage dependence of lidocaine inhibition of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated HCN1 channel

Affiliations

Cation and voltage dependence of lidocaine inhibition of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated HCN1 channel

Igor Putrenko et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Lidocaine is known to inhibit the hyperpolarization-activated mixed cation current (Ih) in cardiac myocytes and neurons, as well in cells transfected with cloned Hyperpolarization-activated Cyclic Nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. However, the molecular mechanism of Ih inhibition by this drug has been limitedly explored. Here, we show that inhibition of Ih by lidocaine, recorded from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the HCN1 channel, reached a steady state within one minute and was reversible. Lidocaine inhibition of Ih was greater at less negative voltages and smaller current amplitudes whereas the voltage-dependence of Ih activation was unchanged. Lidocaine inhibition of Ih measured at -130 mV (a voltage at which Ih is fully activated) was reduced, and Ih amplitude was increased, when the concentration of extracellular potassium was raised to 60 mM from 5.4 mM. By contrast, neither Ih inhibition by the drug nor Ih amplitude at +30 mV (following a test voltage-pulse to -130 mV) were affected by this rise in extracellular potassium. Together, these data indicate that lidocaine inhibition of Ih involves a mechanism which is antagonized by hyperpolarizing voltages and current flow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lidocaine inhibits HCN1-mediated Ih conductance to a greater extent at less negative voltages but does not alter the voltage-dependence of Ih activation. (A) Representative traces of Ih activated by membrane voltages in the range from −30 mV to −135 mV at 30 mM extracellular potassium under control conditions and following application of 600 µM lidocaine. Activation voltage pulses were followed by a repolarization to −65 mV. (B) Plots of steady-state Ih, before and after lidocaine, versus voltage, collected from current traces as shown in ‘A’; Ih amplitudes in the presence of lidocaine were normalized to those in the control solution lacking lidocaine. (C) Plots of Gh, determined from tail current amplitudes at −65 mV as shown in ‘A’, before and after lidocaine, versus voltage; Ih amplitudes in the presence of lidocaine were normalized to those in the control solution lacking lidocaine. The solid curved line represents fitting of the values by a single exponential Boltzmann relation. Neither the mid-activation voltage (V 1/2) of Gh nor the slope factor of this relationship was altered (n = 4; −87.2 ± 2.7 vs. −86.9 ± 3.6 mV and 8.5 ± 0.6 vs. 8.7 ± 0.6; paired t-test, P = 0.79 and P = 0.89, respectively). (D) Plots of the fraction of steady-state Ih and Gh inhibited by lidocaine versus voltage. Steady-state Ih inhibition increased from 43.9 ± 5.8% at −135 to 62.4 ± 3.3% at −90 mV (n = 4; ANOVA, P = 0.038) whereas Gh was not altered significantly (n = 4; 69.3 ± 2.0 versus 70.5 ± 2.1%; P = 0.98).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Raising extracellular potassium increases Ih amplitude at −130 mV in CHO cells that express the HCN1 isoform. (A) Representative traces of Ih elicited by the voltage protocol shown below them from the same cell exposed to extracellular potassium concentrations of 5.4 and 60 mM. The magnitude of Ih (for both inward current determined at −130 mV and outward current determined at +30 mV) was calculated as the difference between the instantaneous current at the beginning of each pulse (Iinst) and the steady-state current (Iss) at the end of the pulse (arrows). Note the large difference in inward current measured at −130 mV and very little difference in current measured at +30 mV between the two extracellular solutions. (B) Amplitudes of Ih density (nA/pF) measured at −130 mV (inward current) and +30 mV (outward current), plotted as a function of the extracellular potassium concentration. Increasing extracellular K+ from 5.4 mM to 30 mM and to 60 mM produced a concentration-dependent increase in the average amplitude inward Ih, which was measured at the end of the voltage pulse to −130 mV (filled circles; n = 22–32; ANOVA, P < 0.0001). The curved line represents a fit of the current density from individual cells to a Michaelis-Menten equation, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of 13.8 ± 7.1 mM. Maximum outward “tail” Ih, which was measured 1 ms after the voltage step to +30 mV to minimize the contribution of capacitance current, was not significantly affected by raising the concentration of extracellular potassium (filled squares; P = 0.12). The reversal potentials for Ih in different concentrations of extracellular potassium and sodium were −26 ± 5 mV (5.4 mM Na, 135 mM K), −20 ± 4 mV (30 mM K, 110 mM Na), and −5 ± 9 mV (60 mM K, 80 mM Na); extracellular sodium concentrations were reduced proportionally to maintain osmolarity (see Materials and Methods).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Raising extracellular potassium increases the rate of Ih deactivation without significantly affecting the voltage dependence and rate of Ih activation. (A) Representative traces of Ih activated by the voltage protocol shown below the traces at 5.4 mM, 30 mM, and 60 mM potassium in the extracellular recording solution. (B) Plots of normalized tail current amplitudes at −65 mV (Gh) versus test voltage at the three concentrations of extracellular potassium. Curved lines represent fits to a Boltzmann function (cf. Material and Methods). Mid-activation voltages (V½) are −79.2 ± 3.6 mV, −82.2 ± 2.3 mV, and −84.7 ± 3.9 mV, at 5.4, 30, and 60 mM extracellular potassium, respectively, and were not significantly different (n = 7–11; ANOVA, P = 0.52). The corresponding values for slope factor (k) were 9.6 ± 0.5, 10.5 ± 0.7 and 12.4 ± 0.8, and were significantly different (n = 7–11; ANOVA, P = 0.045). (C) Plots of fast (τ fast) and slow (τ slow) time constants of activation of steady-state Ih measured at −120 mV as a function of extracellular potassium concentration. The values obtained at different potassium concentrations were not significantly different (n = 7–11; ANOVA, P = 0.42 (τ fast), P = 0.3 (τ slow)). (D) Plot of time constants of Ih deactivation as a function of the extracellular potassium concentration. The values of time constants of Ih deactivation was significantly different between values obtained at 5.4 mM, 30 mM and 60 mM extracellular potassium (n = 5–11; ANOVA, P < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Elevation of extracellular potassium concentration opposes the effects of lidocaine on HCN1-mediated Ih amplitude. (A) Representative traces of inward steady-state and outward Ih under control conditions and following application of 100 µM lidocaine with a concentration of 5.4 mM, 30 mM, or 60 mM of potassium in the extracellular solution. Activation voltage pulses (1 s) producing inward steady-state current, followed by by a repolarization pulse to +30 mV to generate outward current, were applied with an interval of 15 s (B). Amplitudes of steady-state inward Ih (−130 mV) and maximum outward Ih (+30 mV) from individual cells with 5.4 mM, 30 mM, or 60 mM potassium in the extracellular solution under control conditions and in the presence of lidocaine (100 µM). The horizontal bar denotes the duration of lidocaine exposure. Note that the inhibition of inward and outward Ih by lidocaine was reversible. (C) Bar graphs of percent inhibition of Ih (left, −130 mV; right, +30 mV) by 100 mM lidocaine at different concentrations of extracellular potassium. Lidocaine produced reversible inhibition of Ih at −130 mV (inward) or +30 mV (maximum outward current) by 48.2 ± 3.4 and 30.2 ± 2.1%, respectively, (n = 6; paired t-test, P < 0.001) at 5.4 mM extracellular potassium. The percentage of Ih inhibited by this concentration of lidocaine was less at 30 and 60 mM extracellular potassium (n = 4–6; ANOVA, P < 0.001 at both voltages; n = 4–6 cells for each concentration).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The concentration-response curve for the effects lidocaine and extracellular potassium on HCN1-mediated Ih at −130 mV demonstrates changes that are consistent with an interaction between them. (A) Plots of Ih amplitude at −130 mV versus concentration of extracellular potassium concentration in the presence of given concentrations of lidocaine (100, 200, and 600 µM). The solid lines represent fits to the Michaelis-Menten equation. An increase in the concentration of lidocaine from 100 to 600 µM resulted in an increase in the apparent dissociation constant of potassium from 5.3 ± 0.5 to 27.3 ± 8.9 mM (n = 4–6; ANOVA, P < 0.0001). (B) Plots of percent Ih inhibition at −130 mV versus lidocaine concentration. The solid line represents a fit using the Hill equation, which yielded values for IC50 of 78 ± 7, 495 ± 133, and 332 ± 151 µM (n = 4–6 cells; ANOVA, P < 0.0001) and estimated Hill coefficients of 1.6 ± 0.2, 0.84 ± 0.12, and 0.92 ± 0.3 at 5.4, 30, and 60 mM extracellular potassium, respectively. Lidocaine’s estimated maximum inhibition was also lower at the higher concentrations of extracellular potassium, declining from 80.7 ± 3.5 to 71.1 ± 5.9% and to 26.6 ± 3.4% upon raising the extracellular potassium concentration from 5.4 to 30 mM, and to 60 mM, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lidocaine inhibition of HCN1-mediated Ih is unaltered at +30 mV by raising the concentration of extracellular potassium (A). Representative traces of outward tail Ih relaxation, recorded at +30 mV following hyperpolarization to −130 mV from a holding voltage of −35 mV, under control conditions and following application of 100 µM lidocaine, at 30 mM extracellular potassium. The tail currents are shown after 1 ms in order to remove any contribution from the capacitive transient and clarity. (B) Mean time courses of lidocaine (600 µM) inhibition of the outward Ih at different concentration of extracellular potassium (5.4, 30, and 60 mM) obtained by normalizing tail currents in the presence of lidocaine from those recorded in control solutions as shown in ‘A’. Time courses were fit with double exponential equations. The extent of inhibition at the beginning of the voltage pulse to +30 mV increased over the course of deactivation for each concentration of extracellular potassium. The initial value for inhibition was larger for the lower concentrations of extracellular potassium, and they reflected the mean values plotted in Fig. 4C. Maximum inhibition reached a plateau and was the same at all potassium concentrations (~70–80%). Raising extracellular potassium from 5.4 to 60 mM did not significantly alter either the fast or slow time constants of lidocaine block, which varied from 1.1 ± 0.13 to 1.33 ± 0.15 ms and from 8.1 ± 0.25 to 9.6 ± 0.9 ms (n = 4–5; ANOVA, P = 0.66 and 0.51), respectively, in the presence of 600 µM lidocaine. (C) Plots of normalized charge transfer versus lidocaine concentration at different extracellular potassium concentrations (5.4, 30, and 60 mM). To estimate the total charge transferred, the area under leak subtracted traces of tail Ih relaxation was calculated by integration and those calculated in the presence of lidocaine were normalized to those calculated in the absence of lidocaine. The solid line represents a fit using the Hill equation, which produced IC50 values of 56 ± 12, 84 ± 8, and 56 ± 7 µM (n = 4–6; ANOVA, P < 0.0001), Hill coefficients of 1.3 ± 0.3, 0.98 ± 0.11, and 1.49 ± 0.23, and maximum inhibitions of 82.2 ± 6.9, 88.1 ± 2.4, and 71.7 ± 2.4%, 5.4, 30, and 60 mM extracellular potassium, respectively. Values shown are those collected from individual experiments.

References

    1. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2010;70:1149–1163. doi: 10.2165/10898560-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vigneault L, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:22–37. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9407-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hille B. The pH-dependent rate of action of local anesthetics on the node of Ranvier. The Journal of general physiology. 1977;69:475–496. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.4.475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strobel GE, Bianchi CP. The effects of pH gradients on the action of procaine and lidocaine in intact and desheathed sciatic nerves. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1970;172:1–17. - PubMed
    1. Bean BP, Cohen CJ, Tsien RW. Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels. The Journal of general physiology. 1983;81:613–642. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.5.613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources