Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 28456617
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.008
Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Expression of concern in
-
Expression of Concern: "Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis".J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Jan;31(1):69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 19. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37984518 No abstract available.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to update the evidence on the surgical management of endometriosis-associated pain. Does laparoscopic excision offer any benefits over laparoscopic ablation? This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Institute for Scientific Information conference proceedings, the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, the Register and Meta-register for randomized controlled trials, the World Health Organization trials search portal, the Cochrane Library, and the British Library of electronic theses. Three randomized controlled trials were included, which enrolled 335 participants with a sample size per study ranging from 24 to 178 participants. Of these 3 studies, data from 2 could be pooled for meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in the visual analog scale score for dysmenorrhea. The secondary outcome measures included the reduction in the visual analog scale score for dyspareunia, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain and the reduction in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 core pain scores. The meta-analysis showed that the excision group had a significantly greater reduction in symptoms of dysmenorrhea (mean difference [MD] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 2.00; p = .05) and dyschezia (MD = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.33-2.29; p = .009) compared with ablation. The symptoms of dyspareunia showed a nonsignificant benefit with excision (MD = 0.96; 95% CI, -0.07 to 1.99; p = .07). Data from 1 study showed a significant reduction in chronic pelvic pain (MD = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.27-3.87; p = .0001) and Endometriosis Health Profile-30 core pain scores (MD = 13.20; 95% CI, 3.70-22.70; p = .006) with the excision group compared with the ablation group. The limited available evidence shows that at 12 months postsurgery, symptoms of dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain secondary to endometriosis showed a significantly greater improvement with laparoscopic excision compared with ablation.
Keywords: Ablation; Endometriosis; Excision; Laparoscopic; Pain; Vaporization.
Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Meta-Analysis of Two Studies With Random Effects?J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):689-690. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 26. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28552623 No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopic Excision vs Ablation for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Feb;25(2):341. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.039. Epub 2017 Nov 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29180309 No abstract available.
-
Author's Reply.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Feb;25(2):341-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29180310 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical