Factors Affecting the Obliteration Rate of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Single Pipeline Embolization Device
- PMID: 28457931
- PMCID: PMC5522641
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.111
Factors Affecting the Obliteration Rate of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Single Pipeline Embolization Device
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracranial aneurysm treatment using a single Pipeline embolization device (PED), and to evaluate the factors affecting aneurysm obliteration rate.
Methods: The demographic characteristics and anatomic features of 58 aneurysms in 47 patients treated with a single PED were reviewed retrospectively. All aneurysms treated with a PED at a single center and with follow-up angiograms for at least 6 months were included in this study.
Results: The overall rate of complete and near-complete occlusion was 84% (49 of 58) after a mean follow-up period of 18.3 months. The rate of complete aneurysm obliteration was lower in aneurysms with an arterial branch arising from the aneurysm neck compared with aneurysms without an arterial branch (13% [1 of 8] vs. 68% [34 of 50]; P = 0.0075). The overall rate of complete and near-complete aneurysm occlusion was 90% (45 of 50) in aneurysms without an arterial branch arising from its neck. There were no statistically significant associations between obliteration rate and aneurysm neck width, size, or type, or history of previous coil embolization.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that a single PED is sufficient to induce complete or near-complete obliteration of most aneurysms. The presence of a branching artery arising from the aneurysm neck is highly predictive of incomplete occlusion after treatment with a single PED.
Keywords: Flow diversion; Intracranial aneurysm; Occlusion rate; Pipeline embolization device.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Solander is a proctor in the use of the Pipeline Embolization Device for Medtronic. The other authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Figures








References
-
- Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858–868. - PubMed
-
- Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Yang S, et al. Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke. 2014;45:54–58. - PubMed
-
- Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Starke RM, et al. Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2013;44:2150–2154. - PubMed
-
- Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, et al. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:1080–1088. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical